Laserfiche WebLink
� 3 <br />r <br />� � <br />H <br />ayy <br />H�H <br />� H� <br />� M ytl <br />Kf yp � <br />H <br />OMd <br />��g <br />(�i Y (i <br />r y�M <br />gy� <br />��N <br />HOy <br />� � � <br />,�, <br />Criter:on No. 2• <br />,::.. <br />That the variance will not be materially detrimental to the <br />propert,y in the area of the subject property or to the City as <br />a whole. <br />a. Findinas• The paving on Federal Avenue is only 20 feet in <br />width and there is a shortage of both off- and on-street <br />parking in this area. Vehicles park in the grassy right <br />of way between the sidewalk and the street. The existing <br />garage is not currently used for parking because of the <br />poor condition of the building. The applicant will be im- <br />proving the parking situation since he will be providinq <br />two full size parking spaces in the garage. <br />b. Conclusions: Granting the variance would be beneficial to <br />the area since by doing so the a, �icant will be able to <br />provide two full size off-street parking spaces. <br />Cr;ter�on No 3• <br />That the variance will only grant the subject property the same <br />general riqhts enjoyed by other property in the same area and <br />zone as the subject property. <br />a. <br />b. <br />Findinas: Other garages in this vicinity and zone have <br />been constrttcted with less than the required setback. <br />Conclusions: Grantinq this variance will allow a property <br />right enjoyed by others in this vicinity and zone. <br />Criter�on No 4• <br />That the variance is the minimum necessary to allow the subject <br />property the general rights described in Criterion 3. <br />a <br />Findinas: In order to provide sufficient lenqth for auto- <br />mobiles and still have room for storage, the six foot <br />extension of the garage is necessary. <br />Conclusions• The variance requested is the minimum neces- <br />sary to allow a property right enjoyed by others in the <br />vicinity and zone. <br />Criterion No. 5: <br />The granting of �he variance is not inconsistent with the goals <br />and policies of the Everett General Plan. <br />a. <br />b. <br />Find?ng� The General Plan designation is single family <br />residential and garages are an accessory use. <br />Conclus:ons• Granting this variance would not be incon- <br />sistent with the qoals and policies of the General Plan. <br />Criterion No. 6: <br />The need for the requesteci variance is not the result of a <br />self-created hardship. <br />a. Findinas: The need for the variance is created by the <br />narrow width of the property and the location of the ex- <br />isting buildings. <br />b. Conclusions: The need for the requested variance is not <br />the result of a self created hardship. <br />2 <br />a <br />� <br />