3406 FEDERAL AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

�• "'� December 6, 1971 �- The regular meeting of the City of Everetl Board of Adjustment was held at 7:30 p, m. , December 6, 1971, in the City Hall Council Chambers, City Hall, Everett, Washington. Mr. Graff presided. Mr. Cronin, Mr. Champion and Mr. Dickson were present. Mr. Ingram was absent, The reading of the minutes of the November 15, 1971 hearing were dispensed wi th , A hearing was held on the application of Lyle Kent, 4322 Rucker Avenqe, Everett, for a variance from Section 15. 04. 110 E. C. C. (Zoning Ordinance) Subsection C: Minimum lot size and �vidth. Requesting permission to utilize an existing residential building lot having a fronCage of 37Z feet, a depth of 120 feet for a total area of 4, 500 square feet which is less than the required: Minimum lot width of fifty (50) feet; a lot deplh of 120 feet, and minimum lot area of 5, 000 square feet. ihe purpose of the variance is to allow for the construction of a two (2) story duplex. SZ Lot 14, all Lot 15, Block 790, Plat of Everett Division "A" (3329 Hoyt). , There was no representaCion in. the audience for Mr, Kent. It was moved Uy Mr. Dickson, seconded by Mr. Champion and unanir.zously carried to hold over a decision on Mr. Kent's application wzCil the next regular meeting of the Board of Adjustment. Mr. Kent will Ue notified of the nexC meeting and he will be expected to present to the Board some type of architectural design showing what his intentions are for the properly in question. A hearing was held on the application of D. H, Maxfield, 3406 Federal, Everett for a variance from Section 15. 04. 270 �. C. C. (Zmiing Ordinance), item No. 4, Rcar Yard: Requesting permission to locate an accessory building to within two (2) feet four (4) inches of the side property line, thereby waiving the minimum requirement of a six (6) foot side yard setback. Lots 32 and 33, Block 829, Plat of EvereCl Division "H" (3406 Federal). A letter oi complaint from Mrs. Miller, a neighbor, was read into the record. (The letter is on permanent file in tl�e Planning Department office. ) Mr, Rudolph Mueller, an attorney for Mrs. Miller, protested the location of the accessory building for the following reasons: 1. The Uuilding restricts some of Mrs. Miller's view of the sound. 2. The melal building will eventually become unsightly, 3. There is no undue hardship shown by Mr. Maxfield. T"