4718 FOREST DR 2016-01-01 MF Import

. . . � , r �-{ -' i � �t �_ , � �. � Chairman Graff and the Board unanimously approved the granting of this variance Eor the following 'reasons: 1.. There are exceptional circumstances applying to the � - subject property that do not apply to other proper- ties in the same vicinity; specifically, because in order for the City to carry out the Peck's Drive Zmprovement Project certain front yard setbacks had t:o be •less than the required twenty (20) feet , d;ie to the acquisition of property by the City. 2. Granting the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or iniurious to other properties in • ' the vicinity. � 3.. The variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right; because a'hardship was created to the Peck's Drive residence when it became necessary to acquire property in • .order to carry out the street i.mprover.ient project. 4. The granting of the var�.ance will not adversely affect the Ccmprehensive Land Use Plan. A hearing was held on the application of Mr. .and Mrs. Ewing, 4718 Forest Drive, Everett for a variance from Chapter 19.14 Section . 050 Everett Municipal Code, Yard requirements ParagraDh � C for: � Permission to build an addition to the existing residence and to building within six (6) feet of the reaz property line rather than the minimum of twenty (20) feet as required in an R-1, Single- Family Residence Zone. � Legal'.Description: Lot Sixty-one (61) of Forest Park Addition to Everett Division 'A' � Address: 4718 Forest Drive After visually viewing the subject property and considering all the facts, it was moved and unanimously approved by Chairman Graff and the Boa;d to grant the applicant's request for ttie following reasons: i i 1. There 4re exceptional circumstances applying to the f . subject property that do not apply to other proper- ties in the same vicinity; specifically, if the sixty- ) five (65) foot frontage on 48th Street had been con- � sidered, the front yard of the proposed addition would be in compliance with the or3inance. � 2. If the variance is not granted a hardship �aill exist to the applicants because medical circumstances in � the family necessitate the addition of space for spe- � ' cialized treatment equipment. 3. That the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the ! appellant possessed by owners of other properties in � ( -Z- !-a