Laserfiche WebLink
b. Conclusions: The appficant's request to convert the existing garage to a <br /> residence would allow them to utilize the e�cisting structure to the extent possible <br /> with the required changes necessarv to meet Uniform Building Codes for li��ing <br /> space. The footprint and location of the building would remain the same. <br /> Criterion No. 2: <br /> That the variance will not be materially detrimental to the property in the area of the subject <br /> property or to the City as a whole. ! <br /> i <br /> a. Findines: The City Public Works Department has stated that the side sewer for <br /> the residence immediately west of the subject site is located along the south side of <br /> the gazage structure. <br /> b. Conclusions: A letter was recieved from the property owner at 1805 Baker and <br /> a letter from tl;e property owner at 1832 Cedar Street was submitted at the hearine <br /> opposed to tne vanance. Also submitted at the hearing was a series o:documents <br /> submitted by the property owner at 2601 19th Street opposing the variance <br /> request. A letter from the property owner at 1820 Cedar Street supporting the <br /> variance was submitted at the hearing. <br /> The Public Works Department stated that if the variance is approved, a sewer <br /> easement for the residence to�he west should be providea � <br /> Criterion No. 3: <br /> That the variance will only grant the subject property the same general rights enioyed by other <br /> property in the same area and zone as the subiect property. <br /> a. Findin¢s: The applicant's narrative states that there are several comparable � <br /> properties in the general azea and at least four within one block of the subject site. <br /> b. Conclusioos: There are many non confornting lots in the north Everett area with <br /> a lot size similar to that of the subject site. Residences on these non confortning <br /> lots whether existing or new construction cacu�ot meet the required setbacks stated <br /> in the Zoning Code because of their limited size. <br /> Criterion No. 4: <br /> That the variance is the minimum necessary to allow the subject property the general rights '� <br /> described in Criterion 3. , <br /> a. Findin¢s: See Criteria�3. J <br /> b. Conclusions: See Criteria#3 <br /> Criterion No. 5: <br /> The grantins of the variance is consistent with the goals and policies of the Everett General <br /> Plan. <br />