Laserfiche WebLink
�� <br /> � H <br /> b <br /> �U <br /> b � <br /> b H y <br /> � � � ZiON LUTHERAN CHURCH <br /> �°amOw <br /> � y � <br /> y FORTY•SEVENTH STREET AND SOUTFI ALGEA A�'ENUE <br /> tif EVEREIT.NASHINCTON 98201 <br /> p � i .�..� �a� � .` 1'ELEPHGNE(2061 252•1429 , <br /> � � � � %''"j` o �Q �� . <br /> � N �,������ �l � <br /> � � � �'�A" "��''� "" JUN 18199Z <br /> � y � IM��t <br /> � N t '�� �CITY OF EVERETT �une t7, 1992 , <br /> � �a r �;; Planning �ePt. <br /> � � i :� ; <br /> � ; , <br /> � HearinG Examiner and In Re: Issuance of Permit 92-173 to I <br /> Department of Public Works Stark to erect a fence on alley <br /> Lity of Everett, Washington right of way. <br /> Greetings: . . � <br /> Enclosed are the appropriate documents that your offices have requested • <br /> together o-iith a $100.00 filing fee as you requested. It seems ironic that <br /> the Nermit cost only $20.00 and tlie protest-hearing fee a 5100.00. <br /> % ' The alley in question does not go through. Be[ween the properties border- <br /> � ��� ing on 46Yh Street, College Avenues, and Alger Avenue, i .e. the owners of . <br /> � lots 1-4 and 33-36 of Block 1 , College liill addi [ion to the ci [y of Everett. <br /> J There is a large magnificent specimen of a na[ive northwest alder tree, which : <br /> I � the current city regulations would provide for special designation. This <br /> I =w� occupies a portion of the alley right of way. , <br /> Mr. Stark is mis-informed abou[ the width (depth) of his property (129 feet) <br /> and the width of the alley right of v:ay (16 feet) . He is �lso in error about <br /> the rear boundary of his property. (ENCLOSED ARE COPIES OF PLAT PLAtJS <br /> I �� OW FILE WITN THE SNOHOMISFI COUNTY ASSESSORS OFFICE) ; <br /> 4!e request the ci[y to do the following: <br /> ' '�' 1': Rescind 1•tr. S[ark's permit to build a ,.'�nce on the al !ey right of way. , <br /> 2. Refund our $100.00 fee, as the difference is manefes[ly unfair--he created <br /> ' the problem. <br /> 3. Assist i•Ir. Stark to determine his easterly lo[ line and confirm the survey <br /> , � which places the line at the edge of Mr. Simmon's driveway, ar.d the westerly <br /> �(�� , line five fee[ from Mr. Ericksen's fence in a westeriy direc[ion. <br /> I 4. Have Mr. Stark build his fence if he so desires on his property lir.� (east) <br /> I <br /> � In our previous letter, we have outlined the reasons for our objection. n <br /> ��1_� addition this would create further hardship: <br /> 1 . Access to compost pile <br /> 2. Fee use of the alley by property owners bordering on it. <br /> 3. The constant change of where 11r. Stark proposes his fence--first in the <br /> middle, then three feet into the rightofway, etc. , �ahen he does not know <br /> where his property line is. <br /> 4. Access to our garden, maintenance problems to keep the alley free of weeds, <br /> mowed and not being an eyesore. We have done this since we became owners <br /> of the property in the 1360's <br /> 5• Appropriation of landscape materials pian[ed jointly viith the previous <br /> owners. (A severe winter two years ago killed some oT [hese) . They <br /> were planted on the property line, determined by our survey. <br /> 4634 SOUTH ALGER AVENUE• P.O.BOX 2116 •EVERETT,WASHINGTON 98203•0(l6 <br />