Laserfiche WebLink
�/ .� <br /> C �a <br /> b) The foundation of the structures are aver natNe stable soils. Those must be at least 2000psf bearing <br /> capacity. This bearing is only acceptable for what is described as a medium dense to dense soils. <br /> Description is provided in the soils logs in the geotechnical report. Care must be undertaken with the area of <br /> test pit#2 on lot 5,the footing depth to be detertninQ below the black layer. <br /> c) A foundatfon setback must be maintaina� to avoid future problems. The setback is recommended to be a <br /> minimum�f 8 feet from the face of the foundation to the face of the slopEs. <br /> d) All the foundation to be fitted with adequate foundation drain which to be directed to dayUght at locations about <br /> 16" fnches below the foundatfon level. <br /> e) The roof runoff must be controlled, collected and directed to a publlc storm system or an on-site adequately <br /> engineered system. <br /> � The alignment and design of the raad and driveways must be in comp'iance of the geotechnical report, and <br /> also thefr drafnage. <br /> g) The erosion and sedimentation problems may be avoided by compfying with the geotechnical repoR <br /> recommendations,during and post-constructfon. <br /> 2. The site steep slopes were found to be relat�vely heavily vegetated with native, upland vegetation <br /> types. Tre�s found were in general, dominantly mature Fir and other evergreen such as Alder and <br /> Hemlock, �Nith c:ense covering and undergrowth. This consists of Salal, various native Berries and <br /> Fems. The site was found to be dry and well drained,with no signs or evidenced of ground water <br /> seepage or water plant loving species. <br /> Also no signs of previous ground movement, as would be evidenced by scarps, toppled or leaning <br /> trees, could be found on site. The parcel appears to be stable and we know of no historical <br /> Iandslide events in the immediate area. <br /> Some mottling was found in the test pits which indicated that the site soils contains at depth a more <br /> impervious layers which are p�ony draining soils. Water is perched above the very slowly <br /> permeable, weakly cemented, wmpact part of the subtratum only for short periods. It flows on the <br /> top of this dense layer to seep on lower portions of these mocierately steep siopes. The water level <br /> will fluctuate depending on the time of the year and the amount of runoff,which causes the <br /> observed mottling. <br /> 3. During construction, erosion and sedimentation recommendations as per the geotechnical <br /> report must be complied with, see "erosion control and drainage" sections. Silt fences, <br /> temporary and permanent side cuts and adequate drainage for all impervious areas are <br /> issues necessary to the site stability. Roof and road drainage to be engineered. We <br /> believe that the report has the necessary requirements to assure the integrity of the site. <br /> 4.. The report recommends the following; <br /> a) As per "Site vegetation removal"�ection, only the necessary removal are allowed. Yhose are the areas of <br /> development. <br /> b) All the surrounding slopes to be vegetated and maintained professionally. <br /> c) The temporary cuts to the foundation to be minimized to the least possible. <br /> d) Temporary side cuts for the foundeliun and the road to be as per the report recommendations. <br /> e) Erosion and sedimentation durin�construction to be prevented as per the report recommendations. <br /> 5. The proposal will be consistent with the purpose and provisions of this Ordinance if the <br /> applicant complies with all conditions cf approval. <br />