Laserfiche WebLink
2.5 �VETLAND FUNCTIONS AND VALUES ASSESS�IEN1' <br />�VeUand fwutions asscssed indude, water qualiry, hydrologic, and habitat functions. The value of a <br />wetland is an estimatc of the importance or worth of one or more of its functions ro socicty. <br />Netland functions were assessed using the �VA State Dept. of Ecology �Vetland ILzting System for <br />�Vestem Nashington (Appcndix B), which includes and assessment of cach of the ��•etiand <br />functioi�s de: bed below. <br />2.5.1 Watcr Qualitv Functions <br />WeUands improvc �vatcr quality by acting as natural filtcrs as watcr passcs through them. \Vcdands <br />improve water quality Uy intercepting surface runoff, removing and retaining inorganic nutricnts, <br />processing organic w;utes, and reducing suspended solids. Plant roots :uid microorganisms in the <br />soil within wedands ofien absorb excess nutricnts that arc dissolvcd in water. Other pollutants <br />adsorb to soil particles. <br />2.5? HvdroloQic P�roctions <br />Nedands function likc nariiral tubs or spongcs, storing watcr and slo�vly :cicasing it. This process <br />slo�vs the water's momentum and erosive potential, reduces flood hcights, and may contribute to <br />base tlo�v to surface waters during dry periods. <br />2.5.3 Ilabitat functions <br />�Vetlands providc a sourcc of subst�ntial biological divcrsity ancl arc among thc most biolugically <br />productive natural ecosystems in the world. �Vctlands have the potential to providc diversc habi�lt <br />for aquatic, terrestrial, and avian species Cor food, water, shelter, foraging, breeding, and eeg <br />dcposition. Environmental conditions favorable to wildlife consist of connections to other habitat <br />arc.is and movcment corridors, intcrspersion atid divcrsity of vcgctation, multiplc plant svata, <br />undcvelopcd surrounding land uses, and similar fcatures. �Yildlifc spccies likcly to inhabit the <br />project area werc idcntified based on the conditions and habitat types prescnt. <br />1Vildlifc habitat on the site was asscsscd Uy walking the subjcct property and cxamining all obvious <br />hene(icial habitai features, such :�s snags and foragc, and by obseiving signs of wildlife. Direct <br />obscrvations consist of actual sightings of spccics, rccognition of vocalizations, �nd presencc of <br />tracks, scat, bunows, and nesting stnictures. <br />2.6 1�4PACT ASSESS�LENT AND NIITIGA'C10N <br />CES assessed pemiancnt and temporary impacts [o wetlands and buffers using preliminary <br />engineering design dra�vings for the project and the surveycd data collccted on wetlands. CES also <br />assesscd permanent and temporary construction impacts to weUands, buffers, and wildlife habitat <br />functions based on Uest professional judgment of d�e effects assaiated with altering vegetation, <br />hydrology, and topography. <br />Criticnl Arens Report J .l�oic 2011 <br />Vie�v Ridge Clmrdi CF_SNI106 <br />