Laserfiche WebLink
CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL <br />July 6, 1987 <br />Job No. 877-3G <br />Shari Barlow and Greg Gabrio <br />Page 2 <br />organic material. The maximum fill thickness found in the test <br />pits was about seven (7) feet 'in the foundation area. Fill was <br />also observed on the slope to the north of the foundation forms. <br />Beneath the fill is a dense sand with a minor amount of silt and <br />gravel. 'Tnis soil unit is probably advance outwash deposited <br />during the last glaciation. No ground water was found in the test <br />pits. <br />CONCLUSIONS <br />The fill found at this site is not suitable for the support of <br />spread footing foundations; the fill should be removed and the <br />footings should bear on the underlying native sand. The fill on <br />the slope on the north side of the house is marginally stable. <br />Some movement of the fill material may occur Ln the future, but we <br />would not expect this movement to affect the house if the fill. is <br />excavated and the foundation is placed on the native, dense sand, <br />at least twenty (20) feet back from the steep slope. More complete <br />recommendations are presented below. <br />RECOMMENDATIONS <br />Spread Footings <br />All uncontrolled fill and topsoil should be excavated from areas <br />where footings will be placed. The native sand soil found below <br />the topsoil and fill is suitable for the support of spread footings <br />meeting local building code requirements. The native sand has an <br />allowable safe bearing capacity of 2000 p.s.f. <br />