5702 EAST DR 2018-01-02 MF Import

BOARD .OF ADJUSTMENT FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER VARIANCE N0.48-86 nDNm� m JAN 9 1987 CITY OF EVERETT Pub'!c Works Dept. Based upon the written request for a variance from the City's zoning code by: Daryl Finley 21015 4th Ave. W. Lynnwood, WA 98036 hereinafter referred to as "Applicant," for a variance from E.M.C. 19.40.050(c) Rear Yards to allow: Construction of a single family residence that would have a rear setback of 10 feet instead of the 20 feet allowed by Code. on the following a?scribed property Lot 2 of Gentry S.P. # 10-85; Auditor's File No. #8605060048 commonly known as: 5702 East Drive The Board of Adjustment, following a public hearing on said application held on January 5, 1987 and further having reviewed all testimony, makes the following Findings, Conclusions and Order: FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: That there have been exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or, conditions applying to the subject property or as to the intended use thereof that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity or zone. Finding: The site is the middle lot of a three lot short plat and has no frontage on a public street. Access is provided via a 20 foot wide panhandle off East Drive that continues to the west to provide an easement access to the rear lot of the short plat. The lot length, at 110 feet, is considerably less than other lots in the area, and in order to provide an adequate turn around and entrance to the garage, which is on the front of the building, the applicant is requesting that the rear setback be reduced to 10 feet in order to leave 30 feet at the front for the turn around and entrance. Conclusion: There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applying to this lot that do not apply generally to other properties in the vicinity and zone. 2. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the appellant possessed by the owners of other properties in the same vicinity or zone. Findifig: Surrounding property owners have lot sizes which are large enough to provide adequate turn around areas on their own property. Lot 2 is relatively small and if the variance is not granted, there would not be adequate turn around area. Conclusion: The variance is necessary for the preservation of a substantial property right possessed by owners of other properties in the area.