My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5018 EL CHARLEE ST 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
EL CHARLEE ST
>
5018
>
5018 EL CHARLEE ST 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2017 6:31:15 AM
Creation date
2/12/2017 6:31:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
EL CHARLEE ST
Street Number
5018
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1►. , �' <br /> . <br /> � � Towner\Schuld\Canfield, LLC a umited UaWNty Compeny <br /> • CONSUL7ING ENc31NEER3 Expeden��ed in Strudural Melysis and Desipn <br /> 7929F—44 Ave.W, SuNe F Mukilleo,WA 98275 425513�8888 425-287-3393 <br /> January 13, 1998 <br /> Tom AAatusz�wski <br /> 14804 Silver Firs Drive <br /> Everett,WA 98208 <br /> 8ubj�ct: ProJed No. C97140 <br /> 5018 EI ChaAee Drive <br /> Everett,WA <br /> Letter No. 1 <br /> Modifications to Original Stnicture by Crane Desipn <br /> Dear Mr. Matuszewski: <br /> Pursuant to your request,we heve reviewed the skelches you submitted to us to detertnine how the <br /> changes have effected the structure, both laterally and vertically. It is our understanding that the <br /> sketches submiried rapresent the chenges you have made and intend to make to the slructure. <br /> The chanpes qenerally invdved ornNtlnp a poNon oi the upper level at the hiphest end of ihe sGudure <br /> and extending the poAion over the Aarage approximately two feet. Induded fn these chenpes were the <br /> insertion of sevarel beams which were avaflable on sRe. We were esked to deiertnine if these were <br /> su�aent for the IocaUons indicated. <br /> The changes made increased the gravity loading on two columns, both of which have been up-sized. We <br /> also found one location whet�e a beam Indicated on the plen had to be up-sized from(3)Dc10's to a <br /> glulam. At those IocaUons where the indicated beam is oversized,we have indicated the smellest beam <br /> which could be used at that location. We find that the changes made have not affected the lalerel <br /> slrength of the building. This is due to the fad that the proflle of the building has been reduced, <br /> presenting less resistance to the wind. At the same Ume,the strength of the shearvvalls has not been <br /> reduced. <br /> Should you have any questions ordesire addftlonal iMormation, please do nM hesitate to contect us. We <br /> trust this fulfills your request for engineerinp modifications, and in that regard, ft is <br /> Respeclfully Submitled, � Cq� <br /> -, ��C sy�y\ <br /> � �� ���� U y �='' IJ <br /> Clayton M. Canfield . . y�, I <br /> � a;�rr, <br /> ���� � <br /> 5�,'v,�,t,�`�c�" <br /> , e,P,�; �o�is� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.