1710 ENGLAND AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

. � � �I � � I� ��i The Public Worka Department has agreed to allow the applicanta to uae !� 20 feet of unimproved righe-of-way behind the aidewalk that will. be '. III put in on England Ave. in order that the applicant will be able to I � construct +i driveway with leae than 15X slope. The lot will etill i� require a coneiderab2e amount of ezcavation and terracing in order to ', I construct a home. I i Conclueion: There are ezceptional and eatraordinary circumatancea ;i applying to this lot in regard to topography and accesa. I'i ' j. �. That euch variance ia neceaeary for the preservation and enjoyment of I il a eubetantial property right of the appellant posaesaed by the oxnere '� of other properties in the same vicinity or zone. I I il Find3ng: Other properties in this area have been granted eetback I i, variancea beca�se of. topography which reatricted the buildable lot � I�, areae. Specifically, the property on the aortheast corner of Dover I and England was granted a variance to a11oW a five foot front and a �I five foot slde setback and Lot 37 on the corner of Dover and Edgemoor 'll wae granted a variance for a 10 foot rear aetoack. I i Conclueion: The variance ie necessary for the preservation and i, �, en�oysent of a substantial property right enjoyed by othera. ' !I I II I 3. That the authorization of euch variance xill not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurioua to property in the ',�� vicinity or zone in which the property ie located. Finding: Other City Departmente had no objectione to the proposal. � The actual location and configuration of the driveway muet be I ',Ii approved by the Public Worke Department during the building permit ', i' review procesa. There Will be no view blockage becauee of the I II topography. � i I� Concluaion: The authorization of this variance xill not be i; materially detrimental to the public welfare or in�urious to property �I in the vicinity or zone. I'� 4. That the granting of such variance will not adveraely affect the Compreheneive General Plan. I Findtng: The 1982 Comprehensive Plan deaignates thie area as single I family residential. ii Conclusion: Granting thia variance will not adveraely affect the i Compreheneive Plan eince the proposed use ie aingle family. �I 'I, RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE I I I APPROVE the variance as requested by applicant with the following conditione. i Prepared bY �� /��a-� I ' r �l��,��1 ' Reviexed b � � i 4726F I, �I j ' I � I �I �