1007 SE EVERETT MALL WAY 2016-01-01 MF Import

DETEAMZNATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Binding Site Plan Y7-85 SEPA i40-85 DESCRIPTION OF PAOPOSAL: Tha proposed a�tion is requested for a binding site plan that would areate two lots on 1.8 acres. The proposed 2ot Y1 would be 30�000 sq. ft. and has a site plan approval (SEPA G7-85)• Proposed lot 42 Would be 49�702 sq. ft. and no development ia proposed at this time. Access and utilities for lot 02 would be via two 26' easements. My future davelo�ment on lot 02 would require another SEPA review when a specific use is known. PROPONENT: Jim and Hrent Baldwin P. 0. Box 5321 Everett, WA 98z06 LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Everett Mall Way Lead Agency: City of EveretL• Planning Dept. :ontact Person: Donald Wood Phone: 259-8731 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does r�ot have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. This developme:lt Will be required to comply aith existing City Binding Sitie Flan Ordinaace. An I:nvironmental Impact Statement is not required under RCW 43•z1C.030(2)(c). Thi�• decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on Fila with the lead agency. This information is available to the. public on request. Tl�is DNS is �ssued under WAC 197-11-340 �2). There is no comment period for this DNS. There is no comment period for this DNS. Responsible Official: Dennis Derickson Title• Planniiig Director Address: City Hall� 3002 Wetmore, Everet�, 'dA 984�� Date• April 0� 1985 ` Signature: You may appeal this determination to the City CLerk at City Hall� 3002 Wetmare Avenue no later than 15 days from the date +:he DNS becomes final by submittin� a uritten statement r.�equesting an appeal which sets forth the name and address of the person aggri,;:ved and a clear and concise statement of Lhe grounds for the appeal. You s�aould be prepared to make specific factual ob�ections. Contact Donald Wood to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. ti�TE: This Final D1�5 may be withdrawn in the event of signif3cant changes in the proposal, disclosure of new significant information, misrepresentation by the applicant, or failure to comply xith the conditions upon which this Determination af Non-Significance is predicated. 0823F � � � � n � � � ARR 1 � ,ya� .�,��.............. . _..... __ ._....._ ��( pF �VERETT Pu�:ic Warks Dept.