1010 SE EVERETT MALL WAY BASE FILE 2018-01-02 MF Import

` . t•ir. Dennis Derickson Page T4:o January 11 , 1980 South �roadw.av L. I .D. Following our discussiuns oL the proposed South L�roadway L. I .D. , there do not appear to be serious qu�stions. I believe that my clients will be wiliing to pr.ovide a power of attorney authorizing the formation of the proposed South IIroadway L. I.D. as explained by the City staff. It is our further understanding that my clients as propertv owners will retain all rigl�ts to comment — ---- — upon (anc o �ect to the benefit tn their property from the � 1 p or posed improvementSp the pcoposed method of asse=sment," ancT -t�proposed assessments to their property. In other words, the sole �ffect of the power oi attorney will be to authorize the formation of the South Broadway L. I . D. and will not ot-herwise prejudice the rights of my clients as property owners to contest other aspects of the proposed Soui-h Broadway L. I .D. 100th Street L. I .U. The City staf-f clarified that the proposed t00th Street L. I .D. did not include the other improvements to 7th Rvenue and other streets south of 100th Street. Such questions and possible local improvement \ ,- districts may iollow but my clients are not beinq asked to ;� sign a po�;er of attorney authorizing such additional \ �y�- local improvement d�stricts. Instead , the proposed 100th y��' �� Street L. I .D_ will be to simply improve the existing right- / of-way. As w� constructed to provide access to the Country ��`� '. .� �� Club Apartme s. The City accepted the right-of-�oay but not �, the improvements. The City believes that 100th Streel- must � be improved including curbs , gutters and sides��alks, t�•io lanes for traff-ic, and possible leL-t turn and/or parking lanes within a 44-foot paved portion. My clients are not cert-ain as to wheCher their pr.operty is benefited by the proposed improvements to 100th St-reet. No final decision was reached on the 100th Street L. I .D. Future North-South Corridor L.I .D. After the stafL explanation of the proposed North-South corridor, and subsequent discussion , my c.lients have concluded that there is clearlv no benefit to them f.rom the proposed L. I .D. Irrespective of whether the North-South corridor. is estab- lished on any of the three alternative rights-of-way, my clients have concluded that they will not be benefitted. tdoreover, inasmuch as their property does not front on at 12ast L-wo of the alternative courses, their consent as a property oianer to such a tuture L. Z .11. is not necessary. 'Phus, my clients are unwilling to sign a power of attorney a��thori�.ing such a North-South corridor. at this time .