1010 SE EVERETT MALL WAY BASE FILE 2018-01-02 MF Import

` April 21, 1980 �vlr. Edward D. Hansen , .- Williams, Novack dc Hansen, P.S. ��V oF Attorneys at Law everett 501 First Na?ional Bank Building � Everett, Washington 98201 C�TY ��LL� ]59-0�59 F.VFX�.IT. WASIIINGTON RE: Everett Mall 8usiness Park 90:0� Our File No: 79-107 Your File No.: 1044-002 Dear Ed: Thank you for your letter of 7anuary 11, 1980 in which you requested clari- fication of a number of specific conditions contained in the "Final Declaration of NonSignificance" for the Cverett ivlall Business Park, and 1 apologize for the lengthy delay in responding to your questions. South Broadway L.I.D. - The City agrees with your conclusions. ` 100th Street L.I.D. - So that there is no misunderstanding, it should be pointed out that the L.I.D will include improvements to the intersection of 7th Avenue S.E. at 100th Street. The 100th Street improvement has been identified as a mitigation of significant traffic impact upon the street. The known benefits to +.he proposed development include safer vehicle and pedestrian usage and easier accessibility and convenience for employees and patrons of the development. Future North-South Traffic Corridor L.i.D. - The primary concern of the City, as indicated in our previous discussions and correspondence, is that until such time as public dedication of the P.U.D. right-of-way has occurred or other alternate publicly dedicated north-south access is developed, a permanent assurance that the potential for a North-South Traffic Corridor established along the easterly portion of your dient's property be provided. Two requirements must be met to provide the City with adequate assurance that such a north-south access alternative is made available and can be appropriately developed if the need arises. First, the property must be reserved from current and future develop- ment, and constructive notice to third party purchasers must be pro- vided. At this iime the City does not feel that conditions attached to the "Final Delcaration of Non-Significance" and the 6uilding Permit issuance will insure adequate constructive r.otic^ to third party purchas- ers, and a recorded document is the only means tiie City feels is adequate to provide such notice. An acceptable alternative may be for the appli- cant and the City to enter into a binding site pl::n agreement, but tli�s agreement would also require constructive Notice to future purchasers. `Ne need to further understand your concerns regarding the recorded document so we can at�empt to accommodate your needs, yet mai�itain adequate assurance the north-south access alternative will remain available