1010 SE EVERETT MALL WAY BASE FILE 2018-01-02 MF Import

Ed Hansen April 21, 1980 page 2 even if property ownership is transferred. Secondly, you have indicated tht your clients will agree that they wilt not oppose the formation of a future L.I.D. to establish the North-South Corridor unless their property is induded as a property benefitted by the L.I.D. When L.I.D. costs are -+ssessed, those costs are spread in - accordance with the sFecial benefiis that aze confirmed thereon (Schmitz vs. Seattle). In other words, it is desired that a covenant be placed on the property that would prevent the property from protesting the for- mation of an L.I.D. While at the same time, it is not desired to restrain any rights to protest the amount of the assessment based on claims that the property is not benefitted to the extent of the assessment. The identified need for continuation of a maintained, North-South Traffic Corridor cannot be permanently guaranteed without requiring a No-Protest Covenant in the event the P.U.D. right-of-way is not available. Sewer Interceptor - The formula to determine sewer interceptor contri- bution is enclosed. Miscellaneous - The City can provide adequate water to the site to meet fire code reguirements. The provision and extension of water mains are the responsibility of the applicant and must be provided at his expense. Claire Olivers of the City's staff will provide specific information re- regarding the proper sizing and location of water mains. I hope this letter answers your questions. Please contact us if you feel further discussion or meetings are necessazy. Sincerely, �J�� i � ��2t �rJ?2�� Dennis L. D rickson Planning Director BL/DD/sk Enclosures