Laserfiche WebLink
v <br />c <br />william Moore, ffayor <br />September 18, 1979 <br />Page Two <br />f <br />/fa Z * S <br />Following the meeting with your staff, my clients have <br />had some additional thinking about the position of the City. <br />From our perspective, it appears as though the City wishes <br />the Mall ownership to sign a "blank check" by agreeing to a <br />number of conditions including unspecified and unlimited <br />financial contributions for a sewer interceptor, regional <br />drainage program, traffic lights, and a local improvement <br />district for streets. Given the preliminary status of the <br />arious projects, it does not appear humanly possible to <br />have specific data concerning the various proposals in time <br />for my clients to make reasonable decisions. <br />Accordingly, my clients are prepared to approach the <br />city's financial conditions from another direction. Specif- <br />ically, the owners will consider agreeing to pay maximum dollar <br />amounts for drainage, sewer interceptor and traffic lights. <br />For example,.the Mall ownership would agree to contribute for <br />each project an amount not to exceed dollars. As <br />far as the traffic signals are concerned, the Mall ownership <br />would like some additional conditions including a commitment <br />by the City to install the signals within a certain time and <br />some assurance that other property owners will. contribute <br />appropriately toward the traffic signals, as well. The exact <br />amount of the contributions for these various items will be <br />determined upon receipt of further information from your staff: <br />and an -analysis of how much the Mall ownership feels it can <br />afford to contribute. <br />This approach has several advantages. From the standpoint <br />of the City, this may constitute a precedent for having property <br />owners contribute for the various improvements which will help <br />the City extract similar contributions from other property <br />owners and developers. Secondly, it affords the City staff <br />some flexibility in designing the various improvements. From <br />the standpoint of the Mall, it places an upper limit on the <br />amount of the Mall's contribution: Most importantly, it will <br />enable the prompt issuance of a building permit so that <br />construction can commence on the Fredericks building. <br />The ownership realizes that the Everett Mall Shopping <br />Center is an impertant part of the City of Everett and the <br />ownership wishes to be a. "good neighbor." Accordingly, they are <br />willing to cooperate as I have indicated. At the same time, if: <br />this matter cannot be resolved in a timely manner so that con- <br />struction can commence on the Frederick & Nelson building, everyone <br />loses. The Mall loses a prime tenant, and the community loses <br />