Laserfiche WebLink
y <br />_ �..... <br />t" H <br />H <br />..� <br />Conference Report <br />Mervyn's <br />o x p <br />February 13,1992 <br />�HH <br />3OS <br />Page 2 <br />H t7 <br />M R S <br />The area of this building is approximately 116,427 square feet. This is 20,427 square feet over <br />the allocated amount of 96,000 square feet to make this building fall under Type II-N <br />z H <br />(N meaning all construction in concealed spaces be "non-combustible"). <br />SSOE and the inspectors preliminarily worked out the following compromise (this solution is <br />be for <br />o� H <br />preliminary due to the absence of the fire marshall, who is out of town and will solicited <br />ty CA <br />jtp � <br />his input on Tuesday, 2-I8-92). <br />ED <br />y Ho ca <br />1. Compartmentalization of the structure to less than 96,000 square feet. This can be readily <br />accomplished by providing fire walls to the deck at some stockrooms including 1-1/2 <br />hour doors. The dock and loading area at the freight elevator is already <br />compartmentalized about 2,000 square feet. <br />2. The possible addition of a fire rated overhead rolling shutter at the entrance to the mall. <br />This would be in lieu of the existing rolling grill. <br />The existing stockroom wall framing now extends to the deck and to make it two-hour rated <br />would require the addition of 2 layers of 5/8" Type "X" gypsum board both sides, floor to deck, <br />1-1/2 hour doors at all openings and 2 hour fire dampers at all duct penetrations (cost item). <br />Another item discussed at the meeting was insulation at roofs and walls. The Washington <br />C-�' Energy Code states all cavity walls reworked during construction must be brought in line with <br />"+ the code. Since our existing exterior walls are concrete block no insulation is required. On the <br />roof the code states that any roof taken down to sheathing must meet an R-30 when replaced. <br />Brian Ritchhart reviewed roof submittal and passed on marking that insulation must be as <br />specified. The roofing spec calls for insulation installation to meet applicable code. Everett <br />inspectors were besieged by the roofing contractor to require only that the roof be replaced to <br />match what was removed. Everett okayed that assuming Mervyn's was providing a furred and <br />insulated exterior wall. Mervyn's is not wanting to fur and insulate all exterior walls since 85+% <br />is existing concrete block at stockrooms <br />As stated earlier the fire protection issue is a preliminary solution and until the fire marshall has <br />v his input, will not be final. Depending on how the fire marshal views this solution will indicate <br />w� if another trip to Everett by SSOE is warranted. <br />Submitted: Kim Procunier <br />�1+ KP/rsr <br />_ Attachment <br />VCR7 <br />SSOE, INC. • 2DO MOTT FOUNDATION BUILDING • FLINT, MICHMAN 48502 <br />I " <br />