220 SE EVERETT MALL WAY 2018-01-01 MF Import

BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. "Land P;anning, Survey, and Design Specialists" March 17, 1987 �j �� l�� I,S ��" � Pl��l� 1 � .. ,. Ll J i:.,;i Mr. Gordon Witcher -•-�•••-••� .........._ _ . ........ .. City of Everett Engineering Department CITY OF EVERETT Public Works Department Put:ic W�rks Dect. 3200 Cedar Street Everett, WA 98201 Re: ARCO Facility Located at Third Avenue SoutheasySoutheast Everett Mall Nay ARCO FAC No. .i44o/Our Job No. 219i Dc�r Gordon: In regard to the instailation of a six-inch sanitary side sewer stuU across Third Avenue S.E., you are aware that Tri-State Construction quo[ed our client a cost in excess of $14,800 to open cut the street and install the side sewer ro our property Iine. 1Ve find this cost ro be excessive and would opt to have ARCO's contractor (when awarded) bore under Third Avenue to make the ccnnection once the building permit is issued. We understand that no open cut will be allowed on Third Avenue once Tri- `itate Construction has completed the final lift pavement on this roadway. It also aUpears likely that this final lift of pavement will be in place prior ro building permit availability and subsequent construction activity by ARCO's contractor. A remote possibility exists that the final lift will not be in place at the time ARCO's contractor is aUle ro make to make the connection, in which case the open cut and connection will be made by ARCO forces. For the intent of our designs, we will assume that a bore will be necessary and will reflect the necessary design on our improvement drawings accordingly for your final approval. As earlier discussed, Tri-State Construction was approached about boring the street on our beh�lf and indicated that a borine coul�l not be donr, hecause of the high potential for conflict wi[h exis[ing utility pipes lyi.�g in this area. Having reviewed our proposed side sewer crossing design and the relationship ro as-buil[ utility pipes, you indicated that the city would have no problem in allowing a boring to occur for this activity. 1Ve would appreciate a short written response ro our office which confirms the city's approval for subject boring and which also outlines any additional permits required for this work. In that this activity will be shown on the improvement plans submitted for building permit, we are not certain whether or not a PuUlic 1Vorks Permit for the side sewer crossing would still be required. 6625 South 1901h, # 102 • Kent, Washington 98032 •(206) 872-5522