220 SE EVERETT MALL WAY 2018-01-01 MF Import

� , Jim Driscoll Land Use Hearing Examiner City of Everett Everett, WA 98201 August 9, 1984 •�ECEIYEp !''.! ^ 10 1984 . ,,��r c.�iRK ';,��od�� AU G 1 G 1984 near nfr. oriscoll: t'ITY.OF EVERETT ��i,��•,� y��.�•k5 Q�•;t, In an,attempt to obtain a building permit for a small "fencing" retail sales office - the building department directed me to tlie Department of Public Works. As a result of my telephone conversation with that department I wrote for clarification regarding conveying road r/w. (Sce lett-er dtd. 7-13-84,) Larry Crawford, Public Services Supervisor, responded (see lett-er dtd. 7-19-84) with�a copy of an "Excerpt of E. ht. C. Title 13 as amended by Ordinance 555-78, 6G5-80 and 793-81. Section 2C was specifically sited. This Section reads "All owners of properties shall dedicate additional rights-of-way as necessary to complete the requirnd strect improvements in accordance with City standards", The Public Works Deparlment has indicated a probable future LID for street improveme�rts on 3rd Ave. If I would sign.an affidavit to the effect that I would join in on a future LID - that would Ue satisfactory. In as much, and as we are not asking for access off 3rd Ave. nor making any street improve- ments, we hereby request an appeal, based on the following additional infor- mation� and conditions: 1. That �ubject lot (Lot 2, IIlk. 14, Intercity Add., Div. N1) is an _ established lot in an approved plat. Said plat included the present 3rd Ave. 35' road riqht-of-way. 2 3 That a consideraUle amount of 3rd Ave. right-of-way remains to be conveyed to the City between Everett [4a11 Way and 112th St. That after acquiring right-of-�+ay along 3rd Ave., it may be several years again pri.or to the opening of 3rd Ave. 9. That prnvious public works department sentiment was to open 3rd. Ave. via lnl:ercity Ave. which would connect South of our property. It was also mentionr_d that in such a case, it was doubt- ful that additional right-of-way would Uc required off our proyerty. The 35' right-of-way being wide enough to service the 1 to 3 parcels which would frontage this section of 3rd Ave. 5 ti L I consider our present proposed use of our property as temporary or as an inter.im usage. (See enclosed letter to building dept.) That I"would" convey the Nortt:erly 52' of the Easterly 30' at tliis time. 1 J � '.� a