Laserfiche WebLink
;" <br />� <br />5. Item 4 from previous letter: Although the glazing in swinging doors is noted as tempered glass, per <br />IBC 2406.3, the area of glazing, door and opening sizes, design, and hardware set should also be <br />submitted. The requirement for panic hardware on this door is not optional (see designers note on sheet <br />A2 on the plan identified as the equipment layout), per IBC 1008.1.9. <br />6. The new windows being shown on the floor plan require an elevation and an architecmral detail to show <br />interior and exterior finishes and waterproofing. Based on the note in plan, these windows will require <br />safety glazing per IBC 2406.3, item 7. <br />7. Ceiling heights should be indicated on the reflected ceiling plan, or in section. The minimum ceiling <br />height fo; occupiable spaces is 7'-G" per IBC ?208.2, except as noted in that code section. <br />S. Item 5 from previous Ietter: Since the occupant load is over 50 in each dining area, exit signs should <br />identify the two means of egess &om the botli dining areas per IBC 1011.1, and two means of egress <br />are required from each space on either side uf the one hour fire separation wall. <br />9. Item 6 from the previous letter: The exit signage as submitted is incorrect, since the dining area north <br />of the one hour fire separation wall requires two exits directly from that space. The plans as submitted <br />are incorrect since the second door was omitted from the dining area east of the one hour separation <br />wall. All door and hardware sets should be submitted in a door schedule, indicating whether the door is <br />an existing door, rated doar or contains glazing, and the configuration and materials for that glazing, <br />where applicable. <br />10. In tUe previous approved permit submittal for this space, the exit corridor wcst of the dining area was <br />shared by another tenant. Tn the drawings submitted for permit, that comdor is ieconfigured without <br />allowing multi-tenant access to the exit corridor. Please confirm if this is an omission that requires a <br />revision. Since there are multiple tenants sharing this address, it is important for the permit record to <br />distinguish tliis submittal from Ute remnining tenants sharing the same address, as some other tenanPs <br />egress requirements may Ue affected by this tenant improvement. <br />11. A north arrow should be included on the drawings, per IBC Section 10G.2. <br />12. Item 7 from the previous letter: Emergency lighting is required outside of the egress doors accessible <br />tactile exit signs are required, per IBC 10113. Thcse requirements are in addition to the illuminated <br />exit signs required by IBC 1011.1, and they should be indicated on the plan. <br />13. Item 9 from the previous lettcr: If the toilet rooms are modified, those revisions will need to meet <br />current code. On the drawings submitted for permit, the revision to the toilet stall and lavatories as <br />shown will require a 5'-0" clearance outside of the door into the men's toilet stall, per ANSI Pigure <br />404.2.3.1. <br />14. Item 10 from the previous letter: a 30 inch by 48 incl� rectangle of clearance without obstructions, <br />centered on the urinal, is required to provide an accessible urinal, unless no revisions are made"to the <br />men's toilet room. <br />15. Item 11 from thc previous Ietfer: The buffet sections should either be architecturally detailed for <br />profiles and construction, or provide the manufacturer's item number and a catalog sheet for review, if it <br />is a manufactured uniL Code rePerences are nat sufficient to illustrate the design for permit review. <br />1G. Item 12 from the prcvious Iettcr: ARcr field inspection today, there is only one exisfing lavatory in <br />tl�e meds toilct room, not t�vo ]avatories as shown on the plans. Sec item 13 on this letter. <br />S N1HakylWord�0060i.0.176U] SL• E�srcn Mill Way Sttmxl eortenion levc .doc <br />