920 SE EVERETT MALL WAY 2016-01-01 MF Import

r � November 3, 1982 _ __ ___ %`I''',:L� — �:�<< .,. '� i;!/�;GC�I _�1.c�• ; ii,�+� �...'_L�% HAR�VION �.AS.SOCI, �;,,., � t ;!�,s � ��_ ��- , N£AL ESTATE. INCOiiPOAhTED ,�� y� � 12061 347.90� I:L61 9G7.5766 �i // :/�� /' ' �L �� Founh Floaq 11000 Lake City Way N.L. L�au4, Wo� �-`�•' � /��'��'°'��.,c'� ,� c;�"Y' Honorable William hioore City of Everett 3002 Wetmore Everett, Wasliington 98206 RE: Everett F1all Office Park Dear t4r. Mayor: As the developers, owners and managers of the Everett I•iall Office Park, we are most concerned about plans sutmitted to the City of Everett that could result in serious traffic and congestion problems on EvereLt I�all Way, west of the Mall. In 19II0, prior to sta�ting construction on the first 50,000 square foot office building in the Everett Mail Office Park, nearly nine nonths were consumed from sutxnission of the Environmental Checklist until issuance of the Negative Declara- tion with mutually agreeable conditions specifically involving vehicular circ�la- tion. The Cit,y staff raised real concerns about the overall traffic flow takin9 into consideration the ultimately planned four office buildings with approximately 175,000 square feet uf suburban office space. John Patzoid did a comnendable job in coordinating a solution that created unified curb cuts and integrated tra`fic flows bet:veen ourselves and developers of the Everett Mall and tlie Everett Mall Village. The enclosed brochure shows the results. Approximately 875 lineal fr.et of footage on Everett hiall Way has two coordinated curb cuts to serve Everett tdall Office Park, Everett Flall Vi11agE, and the theatres, plus access to the improved portion of the PUD r•ight-of-way. Now Capital Savings & I_oan is requesting the addition of two permanent curb cuts on a site with approxir�aiCly 215 ;a�t of fronYage, wrich creates five main accass points to Everett Mall W4y withi�� a distance of approximately 400 lineal feet. This situation is certainly less the.n desirable and will undoubtedly work to the detriment of those using Everett Mall Way, the property owners, their tenants �nd customers. In fact, a superior solution had been arranged between the parties in the past. On two separate occasions aie were told by Capital Savings & Loan that we had an agreement with them on a privately negotiated, shared in9ress/egress from our property. We both readily admitted the coordinated in9ress/egress was in both of our best interests. They sent an officer to our office to finalize the concept o` the details so the plan could be imp'emented. Two months later we were told ti,ey had arbitrarily changed tli�ir mind and planned to proceed independently, "because it was simpler and mo:^e expedient timewise". �y I �`f r �