Laserfiche WebLink
Exhibit 1 13 <br /> Habitat gained from restoration: 6.0 IVA acre-points. <br /> (5) Mechanisms to insure implementation and to measure effectiveness: The <br /> project will be a condition of permits issued for the rail/barge transfer facility <br /> by the US Army Corps and WDFW. The Project includes a 20-year <br /> monitoring and adaptive management program that addresses vegetation, fish, <br /> wildlife, benthic invertebrates, beach stability, and requirements for <br /> renourishing to offset sediment losses from the restored beach. <br /> b. Public lands between the Mukilteo Tank Farm Property and the Port of Everett's <br /> South Terminal (EMU 7) - Culvert Replacement <br /> (1) Project Description: At least nine streams discharge to Port Gardner Bay <br /> through culverts under the BNSF railroad in this area. These streams include <br /> Edgewater Creek, Powder Mill Gulch Creek, Narbeck Creek, Merrill and Ring <br /> Creek, Phillips Creek, Glenwood Creek, Seahurst/Glenhaven Creek, Pigeon <br /> Creek No. 2, and Pigeon Creek No. 1. Potential restoration opportunities <br /> include replacing the existing culverts under the BNSF railroad that limit <br /> transport of sediment and woody debris from these small coastal streams to <br /> the beach. In some cases, these culverts also restrict access by anadromous <br /> salmonids to those streams. Culvert replacement would be in the form of <br /> either a bridge, or a larger, less restrictive culvert designed to allow both <br /> upstream and downstream passage of salmonids as well as free delivery of <br /> stream-born sediments and wood to the nearshore. <br /> (2) Schedule: No culvert replacement is currently scheduled. It is most likely <br /> that this activity would occur in conjunction with a large scale public project. <br /> (3) Costs/Funding Sources: Cost of culvert replacement is unknown but expected <br /> to be high. A primary factor in construction costs is the affect it could have on <br /> operating the BNSF rail line during certain portions of the work. Culvert <br /> replacement in this area has been deemed to provide only minimal habitat <br /> benefits for the cost incurred; however, in certain circumstances this action <br /> may make sense. <br /> Prospective Funding Sources: Grants and development mitigation are <br /> possibilities for funding sources. The ability to implement this project and the <br /> actual timing of any restoration is contingent on a significant public works <br /> project, securing funding for this restoration and feasibility challenges. <br /> (4) Habitat Function Benchmark Gain: A culvert replacement would theoretically <br /> improve access by anadromous fish to one of the small freshwater streams <br /> entering the sound along this beach reach. Unless the stream mouth upstream <br /> 135 <br /> Section 3 General Goals, Objectives,Policies and Regulations Page 3-65 <br />