Laserfiche WebLink
EXHIBIT A-2 <br /> SCOPE OF WORK <br /> 10 <br /> 3. Other considerations <br /> • Use of WSDOT road at west end <br /> • Fixed end pile connections <br /> • Sliding saddle supports <br /> • Vertical piles <br /> • HDD trenchless construction (limited geotechnical input) <br /> D. Project Management and Meetings. Participate in an Alternatives/Constructibility Workshop <br /> after completion of the initial analysis. Provide needed project management associated with <br /> the subcontracted services. <br /> E. Supplementary Geotechnical Memorandum. Prepare a technical design memorandum <br /> summarizing the results of this initial geotechnical work,which may be presented in the form <br /> of an addendum to the geotechnical design memorandum. Incorporate additional information <br /> collected from the supplemental geotechnical investigation and laboratory testing programs, <br /> update foundation conditions,engineering properties of soils, design criteria, etc. <br /> Task 5. Alternative Design Concepts Evaluation <br /> Identify, develop and evaluate alternative design concepts for the replacement of Pipelines 2 and <br /> 3 for Phase 6 that might ultimately result in a lower cost solution for design and construction of <br /> the Phase 6 Project (Transmission Lines 2 and 3). The work will include the following: <br /> A. Brainstorming Workshop. Investigate the potential for use of construction mats, pontoons, <br /> and use of an at-grade road in lieu of pile supported construction access. Review potential <br /> environmental and regulatory impacts associated with this and associated with a possible <br /> extended fisheries impact construction window. Prepare for and attend an initial <br /> Brainstorming meeting with City staff to identify various potential options for reducing <br /> costs of construction for Phase 6. <br /> B. Interviews With Bidders. Initiate and conduct interviews with three Contractors that <br /> submitted bids on the original Phase 6 elevated pile supported design to receive input and <br /> ideas regarding potential cost saving concepts. Identify methodologies, construction <br /> assumptions, general conditions or specification requirements, risk allocation, or other <br /> factors that were cost drivers that resulted in the higher than anticipated construction costs <br /> in the bids and potential alternative approaches that could be considered to reduce overall <br /> construction cost. Prepare and transmit written questions to each Contractor prior to the <br /> interview. Arrange and conduct interview at MWH office and prepare written meeting <br /> notes. Interview may be conducted remotely by telephone if desired by Contractor. <br /> C. Develop and Evaluate Alternative Design Concepts. Develop and assess alternative design <br /> concepts to the original Phase 6 design. Consider four basic alternatives, as described <br /> below. The alternative evaluation work associated with the at-grade road (item 2), buried <br /> pipeline south of the dike (item 3), and HDD (item 4) options will proceed only upon <br /> authorization from the City at their discretion. <br /> MWH Page 4 EVERETT PHASE 6-Supplemental Agreement No 2 <br /> 8/5/05 EXHIBIT A-2—SCOPE OF WORK <br /> 3 <br />