Resolution 5248 - Laserfiche WebLink

5. Campus Growth and Future Travel Behaviors 5.1 Employee Growth and Space Consolidation Projections of future staff needs in terms of"full-time equivalent" (FTE) employees were provided by the County and are summarized on Table S. The existing administrative staff is located in buildings on-campus and off-campus leased space. The Administration FTE's for 2001 include on-campus and off-campus downtown employees. It is assumed that these employees will move on-campus by 2005 with the consolidation of floor space. Table 5 Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) Employee Projections Existing(2001) County FTE Employees Day-time On-Campus Leased Space Total On-Campus Administrative 599 565 1,164 589 Courts 200 94 294 200 Jail 275 0 275 117 Total 1,074 659 1,735 906 2005 County FTE Employees Administrative 1,164 0 1,164 1,154 Courts 294 0 294 294 Jail 450 0 450 205 Total 1,908 0 1.908 1,653 Growth from 2001 to 2005 Growth 1 834 (659) 175 747 It is also noted that the staff for the jail /justice center work 7 days a week and 24 hours per day. The typical weekday shift accounts for about fifty percent of the FTE requirements. These staff do not contribute to the typical weekday traffic demands and have been subtracted from the total FTE's to produce a net "Day-time On-Campus" FTE population, as shown on Table 5. 5.2 Employee CTR Objectives and Travel Demands The County Campus is a Commute Trip Reduction(CTR) employer. Its goal is to reduce non-exempt employee commuter travel by single-occupant vehicle (SOV) to 53% of all work trips. Currently, we estimate that about 71% of all county employees are SOV commuters. However, employees who are required to take County vehicles home for their work are exempt from the CTR goals. The County CTR report for 2000 indicates that about 63% of the non-exempt employees use SOV's for commuting. The County currently has a very progressive CTR program. There are priority parking and reduced parking fee incentives for carpools and vanpools, and subsidies are available CRI Transportation Impact Analysis Page 10 June 2002