2521 LOMBARD AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

6. Photos of Subject Site (Notice was given of the date and time of the hearing No individuals other than the Appiicant and its representative appeared at the hearing. The City presented its staff report which adequately provides information. The staff report is ihe main basis of the record in this matter.) All of ihe exhibits are available for inspection at the Hearing Examiner's Office located at 2930 Wetmore Avenue, 8th floor, Everett, Washington. After due consideration of the testimony and evidence presenied by the Applicani and testimony and evidence elicited during ihe public hearing, the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions constitute the basis of the decision of the Everett Hearing Examiner. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Tl�e Applicant requested approval of a Special Property Use Permit for ihe construction of an approximate 10,000 square foot addition to an existing 7,500 square foot church facility at 2521 Lombard Avenue, Everett, Washington. It is the inte��t of the Applicant to demolish an existing 2,800 square foot building and replace it wiih the proposed consiruction. (exhibif 1) 2. The subject property is zoned R-4, Nlultiple Family High Density and has a General Comprehensive Plan designation of 1.7 Muliiple Family 30-50 Dweliings Per Gross Acre. The existing land use is church and parking facilities. The church has been on-site ior over 50 years. (exhibit 1, pages 1 & 2) 3. Tiie properties to ihe north, south, and west are zoned R-4 and developed with residentiai uses. The property to the east is zoned C-1 and is developed with an ;:Iley. (exhibit 1) 4. In order for a Special Property Use Permit to be granied, the General Evaluaiion criteria of Everett Municipal Code (EMC) 19.41.150.0 must be satisfied. Those criteria include: (1) The need of the neighborhood, district, or Cily for a proposed Special Property Use. (2) The adequacy of streets, utilities, and public services required to serve a proposed use. (3) The impact of traffic generated by the proposed use on ihe surrounding area, pedestrian circulation and public safety; and ability of the proponent to mitigate such potential impacts. (4) The provision of adequate off-street parking, on-site circulation, and site access. �'—�. � 2 � �"�) � :