3322 LOMBARD AVE 2018-01-02 MF Import

I'�.N"4 �n^". perfect but the subject building, as proposed, goes a long way toward maximizing the poter.tial of the subject site. The variances requested are r.ot major. However, failure to grant the variances requested would ultimately result in unnecessary design compromises detracting from subject potential, compromises which are unfair to the owner and indirectly, the neighborhood. Proceeding from the premise that, if a job is worth doing, it's worth doing right, failure to grant the variances would, generally speaking, preclude doing the job right for the reasons given aUove, and this preclusion is considered an unnecessary hardship which will run with title to the subject site. Conditions of Approval: So as not to grant a special p�ivilege to me by the granting of this yariance, i submit the following sugg?stior. to be considered so as not to cause inconsistencies with other properties in the vicinity and zone in which I am located. These variances are requested because the subject site is relatively small . For larger sites it should, generall�� speaking, not be necessary for such variances to be given in order to attain functional utility and aesthetic impact similar to what is desired for the subject. C;uidelines should be redrawn somewhere. The location of these guidelines should be made by the Planning Dept. The matter should be approached from a vantage point of wisdom and common sense rather than as something which can be "cut and ; dried" . From a planning point of view, set-back requirements for � �