Laserfiche WebLink
, � <br /> Public Welfare: The variance requested will nat be detrimental <br /> to the public welfare or inj•�ri�us to the <br /> properties or =mprovemer,ts in the vicinity of a zone in wnich <br /> the property is located. With respect to the appearance of the <br /> subject building as proposed, the conficlration of the side <br /> decks and the addition of the awning, or canopy, will enhance <br /> the at�ractiveness of the subject building and indirectly, <br /> therefore, the neighborhood. The addition of the front decks <br /> is not expected to either enhance or diminis� the aesthetic <br /> impact of the subject building. <br /> Rejection of Variance Reques':: If this variance is not <br /> granted, an unnecescary <br /> hardship will continue to the owner of this property, the cause <br /> of which is beyond his control. Reasonably assuming that the <br /> highest a.:id best use of the site is for multi-family development, <br /> it then becomes very difficult to adequately develep the subject <br /> site �in a manner accommodating market demand. Unusual compromises <br /> in design need to be made to "fit" a building on the small <br /> subjeck si.te while still providing decks, p�rking and access <br /> within the designated set-back areas. These compromises, in the <br /> o�inion of the writer, would result in aesthetic and functional <br /> characteristics well below the level which could possibly have <br /> been attained. Ar3 once the building is constructed, that ' s <br /> it. It may fit nicely within the guidelines of zoni.ng and <br /> building codes, but not within the neighborhood. No design is <br /> 0 <br />