My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2430 LOWER NORTON AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
LOWER NORTON AVE
>
2430
>
2430 LOWER NORTON AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2017 8:04:30 AM
Creation date
2/17/2017 9:18:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
LOWER NORTON AVE
Street Number
2430
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
OCS-07-98 15:47 FROM=EVERETT PLANNING DEPT ID:4252578742 PAGE 2/4 <br />Findings: Norton Avenue is not improved to current Ciry Stardards. <br />Conclusions: The City of Everett Public Works Deparmient will decermine the <br />amount of npgrade requued to Norton Avenue. <br />3. The impact of traffic generated by the proposed use on nc� surrounding area, <br />pedestrian circulation and public safety; and the ability of the proponent to mitigate <br />such potential impacts. <br />Findings: The City of Everett Public Works Department has not requesteci mitigation <br />from the impact of additional traffic generated from the proposed daycare. <br />Conclusions: There witl be no significant �affic impac[. <br />4. The provision of adequate oft=sueet pazking, on-site circulation, and site access. <br />Findings: This is a propcsed pazking lot. <br />Conclusions: This criteria does not apply. <br />5. Compatibility of proposed structures and improvements with surrounding properties, <br />including the size, height, localion, setback and arrangemeat of all proposed <br />buildings and facilities, especially as they relate to ligl�t and shadow impacts on more <br />sensitive land uses and less intensive zones. <br />Findings: No suuctures aze proposed. There are aailroad uacks to the west, a <br />parking lot to the uorth, and a vacant ciry lot to the south. <br />ConcIusions: There will be no i�npacts on surrounding properties. <br />6. The number, size and location of signs, especially as they relate to more sensitive <br />land uses. <br />Findings: Sign Category C applies to the proposed use. No signage is proposed <br />Conclusions: All signage must meet Subsection �6.170.0 of the zoning code. <br />7. The landscaping, buffering and screeniag of buildings, parking- loading and storage <br />azeas, especially as they relate to more sensitive land uses. <br />Findings: Landscape Category B applies to ffie proposed pazking lot. The applicant <br />has proposed a landscape modification to the requirecl landscaping azound the <br />perimeter of the site. Tfie agplicant proposes no landscaping along the north or south <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.