Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />Mr. Steve Stanley Page 2 Ocrober 29, 1992 <br />proposed dwelling location which the appiicant will enhance with plantings of evergreen vees and <br />shrubs following removal of Himalayan biackberry. <br />�' f tion of 37 O50 B Everett Znnin¢ Code <br />l. There is no other reasonable ure or feaslble alternative �o the proposed deve(apment with les.s <br />rmpacr on rhe environmentalty sensirire area. The properry is a Iegally subdivided single family <br />residential lot. The siting of thc residence is as far away as practicable from the wetlands and <br />steep slope as possible, assuming an 8 foot side yard setback and a 20 foot front yazd setback. <br />2. The proposed develnpmrnt does not pose a thrcat ro the puLlic lteuldt, safery artd weffure on <br />or oj%of the subject fot. 17ie proposed house (ootprint is located on Alderwood soils, which are <br />underlain by hardpan. Placement of structure (ootings into the underlying hardpan is anticipated <br />to preclude destabilization oC the slope area. <br />3. Any alreratians permitted to the requirement of thls Ordinunce shal! be the minimunt necessary <br />to n[!ow for reasoncble uce of rhe properry. The permitted reductions in buffer and front <br />setbacks. <br />4. The inabtliry af the applicant ro derive reasonabfe economlc use ojrhe properry is nor the <br />resulr ojacttons try rhe applrcant in subdivfding the properry or adjusring a boundary line rhereby <br />creating rhe undevelopable condition ujrer rhe ej%ctive dme njrhis Ordinance. This is an <br />established, legally subdivided lot. The most favorable location of the dwetling is in ihe eztreme <br />southwest corner of the property. Theretore, modification of Lhe front yard and ESA setback <br />requirements are required. <br />5. The proposa! mirrgares the impacts on rhe environmenrally sensitivc areus to �he maximum <br />exrent possible. The degraded portion of the slope ro the notlh of the dwelling will be replanted <br />with evergreen trees and shrubs and will be subject ro an ezecuted covenant for its rerention as an <br />ESA buffer and preclude any activiry or developmen[ (inciuding cleazing, gardening, dumping of <br />garden cuttings, trails and swctures). <br />Under the "reuonable use" provisions of Section 37.050, we request approval of a variance from <br />the front yard and FSA setbacks as proposed. Pizase contact me or Paul Svomme with an <br />questions. <br />We look fonvard to your response at your earliest convenience. <br />Sincerely, <br />��� �� <br />Anihony Roth <br />Encl. Figures l and 2 <br />