1215 MADRONA AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

a, dines: The applican¢ states that the exisdng residence is setback 37' from the front property line and it is not possible to pmvide a usable garage and maintain the required 20' setback from the front property line. b. on lusions: In addition to the existing residence on ��ie site there is an existing carport attached to the residc.^.c� which is located within the front setback area only 14 feet from the front property line along Madrona Ave. ['riterion No. '' • That the variance will not be materially detrin�ental !o the property in the uea of the subject property or to the City as a whole. a, m in • No written adverse comments have been received at this time. b. Conclusions: The variance should not be materially detrimental to the property in the azea of the subject property or to the City as a whole. Criterion No. 3• That the vaziance will only grant the subject property the same general rights enjoyed by other property in the same azea and zone as the subject property. a, n in : The applicant has provided some pictures (Exhibit /�4/pages 1-4) of other gazages in the azea which do not appear to meet the building setback requirements from the property line abutting the street. b. Conclusions: The granting of the variance would allow the subject property the same rights enjoyed by other properties in the area of the subject property. Criterion No. 4: That the variance is the minimum necessary to allow the subject property the general rights described in Criterio� 3. e, in : See Criteria N3. b. Conclusions: See Criteria N3 Criterion No. 5: The granting of the variance is consistent with the goals and policies of the �verett General Plan.