9009 W MALL DR 2018-01-02 MF Import

�� m�x C, N � Hx !/� yxH k � H 7tl � H � [A H � 0 � HC H�g �V � t"y`Z t-i y gy oG� �� HOCyi� line and a six foot. fence along the western bor- der extended to the access point for the apart- ments and alonq the eastern boundary. b. Concl.usion: The extraordinary circumstances in this case is the desire to provide additional screeninq and security measures between the mobile home park and the apartment complex. Criterion No. '� That such. variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoy- ment of a substantial property right of the appellant possessed by the owners of ather properties in the same vicinity or zone. a. Findina: Ottie1- property owners of similar type prcjects have been able to satisfy the need for screening and security from adjacent single family uses by providing fencing and landscaping within City code requirements. Granting this vari�nce would a11ow the property owner to satisfy the desire of the aciaoin.ing residents that there be in- �reased screening and security between the two uses. In the past, the Hoard qranted a similar request from .t single family resident adjacent to a larr3e apartment complex in the Silver Lake Area. b. Conc]usion• Gran�ing this ��ariance would allow the applicant a ps:9perty right possessed bg others since it �wild alloo� him to provide screening and secu- �-ity as requested by the adjacent property own- ers. Criterioii No. 3; That the auth^>ization of such variance will not be materially detrimental '::o the public welfare or injuri.ous to property in th2 vicinity or zone in whiah the property is iocate�. �. F�nd�na: The increase in the fence height will provide rcth additional screeninq and security for the mobile home park to the north. The variance is sought at the request of the adjacent mobile home park and will not adversely affect any other properties. In addition to the fencing, the owner will be providing an extensive vegeta- tive buffer along the northern edge. b. Conolusion: Based on the above findings, granting this vari- ance would not be detrimental to the public wel- fare or injurious to others in the vicinity and zone. Criterion No. 4• That the yrantinq of such vari.ance will not adversely affect the Comprehznsive General Plan. a. Findina: The General Plan designation for the site is Re- gional Commercial Cent�r/Office Park; howe�er, the zoning has not been changed tu implement that dasignation. The pending C-1, with con- tract zone that will apply to this property docs permit residential use and the proposed fence height variation would be for that residential use.