Laserfiche WebLink
G & M Investments <br />November il, 1993 <br />SUBb . :P'ACE <br />P-3161 <br />Pacte 3 <br />The subsurface conditions were explored with six test pits at <br />the approximate locations shown on the Site Explor�ition Plan, <br />PlatP 2. The field exploration prog=am was based upon the <br />proposed construction and required design criteria, site <br />topography and access, subsurface conditions revealed during <br />excavation, the sc�pe of work outlined in our proposal, and <br />time and budget con�.traints. <br />The test pits were excavated on October 27, 1993 with a <br />rubber-tired backhoe owned and operated by Evans Brothers <br />�xcavating. A geotechn?cal engineer from our staff observed <br />the excavation process, logged the test pits, and obtained <br />represPntative samples of the soils encountered. "Grab" <br />samples of selected subsurface soils were collected from the <br />backhoe bucket. The Test Pit Logs are attached to this report <br />as Plates 3 through 5. <br />The teat pits encountered up to 3 faet of loose sandy topaoil, <br />and in some locations np to 2-1/2 feet of loose sandy fill <br />material overlying tl�e old topsoil layer. Underlying the <br />topsoil and/or fill material there is a layer �f weathered, <br />sedium-dense, silty sand. The silty sends became dense to <br />���ry dense at depths of approximately 5 to 6 teet. These <br />dense to very dense sands have been glacially compacted and <br />are referred to in this report as glacial till. <br />The final loga represent our interpretations of the field logs <br />and laboratory tests. The stratification lines on the loga <br />represent the approximate boundary between soil types at the <br />exploration locations. The actual transition between soil <br />types may be gradual and subsurface conditions may vary <br />between exploration locations. The relative densities and <br />moisture descriptions indicated on the test pit loga are <br />interpretive descriptions based on the conditions obaerved <br />during excavation. The logs should be reviewed for specific <br />subsurface information at the locations tested. <br />(iROUNDWATER <br />No groundwater seepage was observed in our explorations. <br />Since the test pits were left open only for a short time <br />period� the lack of seepage levels on the logs does not <br />necessarily indicate that groundwater will not be encountered. <br />GEOTECH CONSULTANTu, INC. <br />