8800 HOLLY DR 2016-01-01 MF Import

J __ . . ._ . _ _�_.. - • � ,�1 li :� . . ;' ��.� . _ � � ` ' 7. Memo to Hearing Examiner fram Jim Hanson Dated J�3nuary 27,1994 Re: Permits (Development of Parking Lot) ''8. Memo to Hearing Examiner from Jim Hanson Dated February 3, 1994 Re: Proposed Compromise Solution All of the exhibits are available for inspection at the Hearing Examiner's Office located at 2930 Wetmore Avenue, 8th floor, Everett, Washington. After d��e consideration of the testimon�• and evidence presented by the Applicant, testimony and evidence elicited during the �ublic hearing, and as the result of the personal inspection of the subject property and surrounding areas by the Everett Hearing E�caminer, the following findings of fact and conclusions constitute the basis of the decision of the Everett Hearing Examiner. FINDINGS OF FACTS 1. EBC Associates (EBC) is the property manager of the property in the 8800 block of � Holly Drive, Everett, Washington. This parcel of land is zoned R-3, Multi-Family Low Density REsidential and is located in the Cascade neighborhood. 2. Tne property is not developed with any structures, but there is a paved 75 space p parking lot which is the primary use af the property. The parking lot was developed in 1979 and was to be used in conjunction wi*h a rnedical clinic complex that was to be built cm-site. Tfie parking lot was the aniy part cf the project that wass completed on-site, and the building was never cnnstructed. 3. Since 1979 there have been various �ses projected frr the subject property, but they have never been developed. tiowever, the parking lot has been used for psrlcin� purposes by the Federal and State governments. Both the �tate of Washington and tha United States government lease parking spaces for their emplayees. 4. In an R-3 zone, a parking lot with��ut any structures is not a permitted use. No variances or conditional uses ha�re been issued for the subject property. 5. The City inspected and approved the construction of the paved parking lot on May 24, 1979. It was not until 1993 that the City approached EBC about the parking iot � not being a permitted use in an R-3 zone. �� 6. The City presented no testimony or evidence to show that the issuance of the �� , -� building permit tor the construction of the parking lot was illegaily obtained or given s �� in 1979. F� r�" 7. An adjoining property o�,mer testified that noise from the parking lot is a nuisance. He indicated that it has baen a nuisance since the inception of the use of the ; - ; ,»ri<ing lot in 1979. '`'� 2 � ��•-� ��. ,=t i ;,_, � : � �:.:, � -w,"� � � .�..�� ._.,�.m.,�..�.� � �� "�: � _ .. ;:-w:�F -^t 4 k �ytia �.. ,.,, ... . .. w�»ne.k;�.�, r .. � . �y ' . - - > . _-. . �. '?a't� �_._..__.� . ?��`L.._�_." � ,. ... . ' ai� �.��.�...,.r. .._..,..��-�- ��-- _. __ —_ ..._.._..—,_ — —