My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3232 HOYT AVE 2018-01-02 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
HOYT AVE
>
3232
>
3232 HOYT AVE 2018-01-02 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2022 2:13:39 PM
Creation date
2/18/2017 5:45:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
HOYT AVE
Street Number
3232
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
225
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�o: Hllen GifTen <br />From: Dave Davis <br />Date: November �v, 1988 <br />Su6ject: F•arkina requirements <br />As I ha�:e previousiy discussed aiith you I h�ve =_erious reser- <br />vations over the proposed par4�inq requirements for the one <br />bedroom efficiency apartments (6C��� sq. ft.) in the proposed <br />par4;ing e�empt �one. I feel that er'riciency ap�rtments in <br />close pro;:imity to the homeport will attract naval personnel, <br />snd adequate parYing should 6e provided for them. <br />I've called three Naval communities to see what parl:inq re- <br />quirements the local .iurisdictions require. <br />1. Maypor-t Naval Station; Atlantic Peach, Florida <br />2 sialls per dweiliny, multiple r'amily and single family <br />�. Alameda �Javal Station; Plameda, Californie <br />1.� stalls {or a one bedroom efficiency api:.. 1.75 stalls <br />for 1 °< <^ bedroom apt. <br />_. San Dieyo, California <br />1.' stalls -For a one b=droom apartment, 1.6 stalls for a � <br />bedroom apt. <br />The tra4fic division conduc�ed a parkin� study o4 two effi- <br />ciency apts. (�=27 Hoyt, 42?�� Hoyt) in October, 1987. The <br />managers of the r_omple:;es were contacted to find out the num- <br />her af vehicles owned per unit. Of the �� units between the <br />taio comple�es, ._1 vehicles w�re owned and park:ed on =ite. F;e- <br />member that par4;ing re�uirements should also include par4;iny <br />for visitors, and delivers. <br />I understand the effort to reduce the par4:ing requirement in <br />hopes of promoting development, 6ut no less than 1 park:ing <br />stall per unit should be provided on site, and S.<J - 1.J <br />stalls provided per unit. On street parallel par4:iny could be <br />r_hanged to r:�nqle parl:ing to provide the additional par4:ing <br />needed for' visitors and deliveries. A parking fund could be <br />create whereby a developer would contri6ut= monies which the <br />City wouid in turn use to �onstruct angle par4;ing in the gen- <br />eral vicinity. Changing p�rall.el par4:iny_ to anyle par4;ing <br />cost appro::imately �15��C� per st��lls. The developer o-iould need <br />to cnntri��ute betaieen $��%J -�%JV dollars per unit to ma1;e up <br />for the •;isitor �ana deliver•, par4:in�3 he is not providiny on <br />site. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.