Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />cr.terion No. 3: <br />r- - <br />That t}ze authorization of such variance will not be materially <br />detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property in <br />the vicinity or zone in which the property is located. <br />a. Findina: Several <br />were received by <br />and residents in <br />October 10, 1988, <br />to the parking in <br />that granting the <br />property. <br />letters in opposition to the variance <br />the Board and several property owners <br />the area testified at the hearina or, <br />that there was a considerable impact <br />the area from the rooming house and <br />variance would be injurious to their <br />Other City Departments have consistently recommended <br />denial of any variances for parking in this area based <br />upon their concern th�t parking congestion would result <br />from such variance. <br />b. Conclusion: Granting this variance would be detrimental <br />to the public welfare and injurious to others in the <br />vicinity and zone since adequate parking would not be <br />provided. <br />Criterion No. 4• <br />That the granting of such variance will not adversely affect the <br />Comprehensive General Plan. <br />a. Findina: The Comprehensive Plan designation is <br />multiple-family, 25 to 50 dwelling �anits per acre. <br />Policies st3te that adequate off-street parking should <br />be provided. <br />b. Conclusion: Granting this variance would a�iversely <br />affect the comprehensive general plan since adequate <br />parking would not be provided. <br />i � REC014(ENDATION: <br />The Planning Uepartment recommends that the variance requested by <br />the Applicant BE DENIED. <br />Prepared by: ���� �� <br />Reviewed by: �/�"��'�- <br />