Laserfiche WebLink
William P. Brust <br />Appeal <br />6-92 <br />Q <br />Page <br />-2- <br />m <br />to S C <br />N <br />FINDINGS OF FACTS <br />is the owner of the property at 4117 Hoyt Avenue, Everetig <br />o m o <br />1. <br />The Appellant <br />is zoned B-2 community Business, <br />IV <br />H <br />Washington. The property, which <br />Washington. <br />The property is used as the location <br />R <br />developed as commercial property. <br />z <br />M 0 � <br />of the 41st Bar & Grill, a tavern and restaurant. <br />zn o <br />has for a parking lot expansion at the subject <br />M R <br />2. <br />The Appellant proposed <br />Currently, the property has 47 parking spaces. It is the <br />z3 <br />y <br />property. <br />Appellant to add an additional 12 parking spaces in order <br />z <br />intent of the <br />As a result of the expansion, a <br />e m H <br />to provide 59 parking spaces. <br />-site would be used for parking and <br />m <br />significant amount of the property on <br />e <br />i ro <br />not for perimeter landscaping. <br />r <br />H O n <br />that adjoins the subject property to the south is zone <br />3. <br />The property <br />R-4. <br />4. <br />The Everett Zoning Code (EZC), Chapter 35, sets forth the landscaping <br />As set forth in <br />and screening requirements of the City of Everett. <br />required for the subject property, <br />Table 35.1, the type of landscaping <br />zoned property to the. south, is either a <br />where it abuts the residential <br />foot wide strip or a Type II landscaping <br />Type I landscaping with a ten <br />I landscaping is intended to provide a <br />with a fifteen foot strip. Type <br />to significantly separate uses and zones (EZC <br />very dense sight barrier <br />laudscaping is intended to create a visual <br />35.050(A)). Type II <br />but includes a see -through buffer (EZC <br />separation between uses and zones <br />35.050(B)). <br />j'A o <br />'afto' <br />requested that the City modify the landscaping <br />5. <br />The Appellant <br />site was submitted depicting the proposed parking <br />requirements. A plan <br />along with an approximate 2.5 foot strip of perimeter <br />1 �" <br />stalls on -site <br />on the south boundary of the subject property. The site <br />�. <br />! <br />landscaping <br />for a six foot high fence on the south side of the <br />�� <br />plan also called y. <br />to dstrip <br />it adjoinsstrip <br />Type IIIt <br />subject property where <br />neither Type P landscaping gr nor <br />however, satisfy <br />landscaping requirements. <br />Appellant proposed 1,358 square <br />to the 2.5 foot strip, the App P <br />feet. <br />6. <br />In addition <br />feet of interior landscapin3 instead of the required 1,218 square <br />islands throughout the <br />The interior landscaping would be provided on <br />parking lot. <br />7. <br />EZC 35.070 sets forth the discretionary authority of the Planning <br />The <br />Director to reduce, modify, or waive landscaping requirements. <br />the instant case is <br />section of EZC 35.070 that is applicable to <br />Subsection "5" which reads: <br />When the Applicant proposes an alternative method of <br />�s <br />landscaping that would achieve the intent and purpose o <br />v JZ <br />the landscaping required in this ordinance in which the <br />throng <br />Director determines to provide superior quality <br />existing ite, <br />the use of native vegetation <br />trees, preservation of <br />preservation of groves of <br />and/or wildlife habitat, increasein perimeter <br />wetlands n <br />landscape with strategic locations, providing unique <br />focal points of interests, or to other means. <br />