Laserfiche WebLink
5 <br />;�, � Ken Callahan _ ^ <br />r,,,-M Ron Cameroo_ <br />�'-7 (.�:� <br />onTt 4/24/f31 ~ <br />� Y 9 Par{:in and Sine ', ,,, ance <br />.,u,ccr Ho t nei hborhood g 1_er vari ,,. <br />This is in resp�nse to the Aprii 16 memo asking for somE other <br />solution to the parking issue for 412o Iloyt. <br />First, the comments to the Board en parking in this other neighbor- <br />hood are with strong founding. Follou,ing is a chronological listing <br />of 25 (t�aenty-five) City involvements with the :nembers of this neigh- <br />borhood �.ho include �iot only thr residents but the business neighbors. <br />All of tlie �5 have been about the parking problem within the nei9hbor- <br />hood. The ;nvolvements range from citizen phone calls, citizens coming <br />in to the htayor or Coirncil, neighborhood meetings on the street or <br />formally at Lo�aell School. The issue has always been the conflict of <br />parking created by the older homes having garages too small for larger <br />vehicles of to��fay, the Olympic 6ank variance of not having enough off <br />street space, GTE's growing parking need, high parking need ef clinics <br />and so on. <br />Each similar recommendation to the f3oard to not approve a parking <br />variance is witi� similar background concern. <br />The minutes show +:hat neighbors protested to the board on this occasion <br />and the request is for an engineering solution to allow the parking <br />variance. The history shows that the neighborhood :s opposed to permit <br />parking. The only engineer�ny solution is to provide the code required <br />oPf street space. Widening Hoyt to install angle parking could 6e <br />interpreted as providing that space by subtracting the existiny nuinber <br />of on street spaces from the increased number of angle spaces and <br />assigning the difference to the development. <br />