Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> ' `' ,� <br /> 5. Where utiliry connections are required Ihrough adjacent properties or connecting into residential areas, <br /> easements must be located in such a manner as to minimize the visual impact on the adjoining <br /> properties to the greatest extent feasible and must be revegetated in accordance w;th a landscaping <br /> plan approved by the Planning Department. Landscaping must be consistent with Engineering and <br /> Public Services requirements for protect�on and maintenance of the utility easement and facilities and <br /> should consist of native shrubs and groundcover. (SEPP.Land and Shoreline Use, Plant and Animal, <br /> and Public Services and Utilities Policies) <br /> 6. See Condition 4 on page 21. (SEPA Land and Shoreline Use, Plan[ and Animal, and Public Services <br /> and Utilities Policies) <br /> 8.7 SEWER <br /> 8.7.1 Threshold <br /> Capacity of the system is 1,700 gallons per gross acre per day, and 4,000 galloas per gross acre per day of <br /> instantaneous peak flow. <br /> Some sites may have capacity in excess of the threshold available to serve poter.tia] users. If a proposal <br /> would exceed 1,700 gallons per gross acre per day and/or 4,000 gallons per p oss acre per day of <br /> instantaneous peak flow, additional analysis will be required. The additional analysis may be as simple as <br /> calculations completed by the Public Works Department prior to a pre-application meeting on a specific <br /> development proposal. The additional analysis must determine how the preposal's sewer demand will <br /> affect the sewer system. Projects with no additional major improvements needed and no adverse <br /> cumulative impacts on the sewer system are covered by this analysis. Additional SEPA analysis will be <br /> required for projects that may require major improvements not identified in the fiIS or that may Itave <br /> adverse cumulative impacts on the se�ver system. I <br /> The EIS analysis does not cover the impacts of construction of a new sewer main across Japanese Gulch. I <br /> Additional analysis is required to review alternative routes for the line that will mi�imize the impacts of ' <br /> the proposal, or altemative means of provilin� se�vers to that area. ` <br /> , <br /> t3.7.3 Mitigation nteasures: None <br /> b4iti�ation Measures: <br /> The environmental impacts of this proposal are documented in the Environmenta] Checklist and other <br /> information on file with the City. The listed requirements are placed in response ro our review of this <br /> information: <br /> NIITIGATION OF ADV�RSE INII'ACTS BY SEPA <br /> 1. All development must pay a fee of$1,00(.00 per PNf peak hour trip to fund system-c�ide <br /> rransportation improvements. For the approximately 607,300 square feet of buildine space proposed <br /> and divided amon� se��en buildines a total traffic mitieation fee of about$524,136 must be pai�l to the <br /> City prior to issuance of permits. Fees will be distributed among the buildings �nd ad.jasted based on <br /> the size and use of the building actually proposed for construction. (SEPA Transpoaa'.ion Policies) <br /> ��'a� <br />