2300 KASCH PARK RD 2018-01-01 MF Import

ro A1 Theal „ FR�M Ron Cameron .• �,s TM � DATE �une 22, 1983 � •��{�K�f^ � � SUBJECT Comnunity Transit dCCe55 t0 Airport CITYOFEVERETT,EVERETTWASMINGTON � In several meetings with Community Transit, th?ir design consultant, Planning, and Boeing. . .the eontract was worked out to cover traffic access & safety problems and the neaded so?utions. F'irst, approval is only for Phase I and that level of Traffi.c Activity. Review an� other traffic control requirements will be made again for Phase IT or xNCY` other e>;pansion. Even thouoh this area is subject to substantial traffic variations, the analysis ccr�ducted by their consultant shows that there should 6e no problems for WORST case, highest volumes, conditions. ` IF 1'HERE SHOULD BE, then, item C on page 3(65 of the agenda)_ requires the ov+ner to use the southern access Y,o 100th St and the Airport Road signal . The analys�s shows no expected problems for Phase I and a required solution if there are, that' s the legal perspec� ;e. ` The pi�actical perspective for Phase I is the Airport Road traffic has tfie right of way, bus traff�c from thc: site has to yield. . .it is nut a condition where the bus traffi.c could control the flow. ;� if there were problems for rush hour huses and vehicles(in the 5:30 to 6:30 am peak) then, the delay costs or safety costs to tlie huses would immediately dictate that they finA an alternative route the immediate alternative route ��ould be turnSny r�gfit arul driving the loop of Sr526 and I-5 to go south instead of turning left across the northbound worker traffic. Either the legal or practical solution will mitigatz any Phase I traffic problems foreseen with the Community Transit analysis. . .the analysis based on City traffic counts, bus projections, etc. ;� �,