Laserfiche WebLink
City of Everett Public Works/J.S. Mcrall <br /> August 20, 1992 <br /> Page Two <br /> (12) See attached foundation plan clarification sketch. <br /> (13) When 2x6 iofill wall is removed, Contractor will have to "head out" a small <br /> triangular section as shown on plan to pick up the tails of existing floor jois[s <br /> that don't extend ro the new wall location. See S1. <br /> (19) As regards over-framing on existing roof, see no[e Sheet S1 requiring <br /> Contractor to contact Structural Engineer (Jim Coughlin � Ratti Swenson <br /> Perbix, inc.) when exis[ing roofing has been removed and existing structure <br /> can Ue analyzed for an appropria[e solu[ion. <br /> (15) See added no[e Sheet E1 indicating that whole house fan requirements are to <br /> be run through each furnace. Gxhaust fans are indicated on Sheet El. Vents <br /> are required to be run Ca the ex[erior as indicaCed on Sheet El. <br /> (16) We feel that the 1991 'N.S.GC. Sertions 101.3.2.1 "Additions to Existing <br /> Buildings" and 101.3.2.5 ' 3uilding Envelope", Gxception 2 would apply in this <br /> case. To [his end, we completed a systems analysis (see attached) which <br /> shows that the non-conforming addition and upgraded, existing occupancy do <br /> indeed have an energy budget which is less [han the unimproved existing <br /> building with the addition designed Co comply wi[h the 1991 1V.S.G.C.. Also, <br /> as noted on plans (see Sheet A1) and per Section 101.3.2.5, all existing <br /> framing cavi[ies exposed during consUvction will be filled to the full depth <br /> wiCh hacC insularinn and [he entire atCic, existing and new, will be insulated <br /> �vith R-36 batC insula�ion, per DeCail A/A2. <br /> Should you have any furelicr questions or need clarification on any of the above, <br /> please feelfree to contacc me at your convenience. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> B YLIS RAND WAGNER ARCHITGCTS, INC. <br /> � <br /> Tom ambrig t <br /> Project Manager <br /> TL:amp <br />