My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
500 LAUREL DR 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
LAUREL DR
>
500
>
500 LAUREL DR 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2017 12:48:45 PM
Creation date
2/19/2017 1:37:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
LAUREL DR
Street Number
500
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Geotechni:al Engineering Study <br />�0-2267 Three Story Addition - 500 Laurel Street, Everett <br />January 31, 200 i <br />DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br />General <br />Page 11 ` <br />Based on the results of our limited study it is our professional opinion that it is <br />geotechnically feasible to develop this site generally as desired and tu build the <br />proposed three story residential addition essentially as planned. The addition may <br />be supported on conventional spread footings. After satisfactorily redensifying the <br />exposed subgrade, the foundations should bear an the firm and unyieltl�ng or <br />redensified native silty sand soil or, as an altemative, on a rninimum of two ieet of <br />compacted structural fill placeo ov�r the firrn native silt subgrade. Where a fill is <br />used, it should extend for a similar horizontal distance beyond the foundatian <br />perimeters equal to, or greater than, the thickness beneath thefooting. This helps <br />to avoid the risk of a lateral shear failure occurring beneath the footings. <br />The carefully and thorouyhly redensified in-place native soils, or a cc,ntrolled <br />compacted structural fill material, sl�ould also be capable of supporti�g <br />conventional concrete floor slabs and floor loads without undergoing any <br />significant deformation. <br />Frum our examin�tion of the site conditions, and the apparent competency of the <br />majority of the in-place site soils, it is our opinion that the site should be subject to <br />little or no settlement under the proposed building loads, providing the soils are <br />treated as descriCed later in this report. We estimate that the potential building <br />load related settlement should be well within the building's tolerable limits. <br />Sased on the relatively dense and granular nature of the sfte soils, and the lack of <br />a shallow water level that could surge and saturate the soil, it is our opinion that <br />the properiy developed and maintained site i., unlikely to be susceptible to any <br />significant degree of liquefaction, or to liquefaction related settlement, under even <br />re�atively severe earthquake conditions. <br />The majority of the shallow surficial in-situ silty sand and sandy silt soil are also <br />considered suitable for reuse as a compacted structural fill elsewhere en the <br />property, if desired. We recommend, however, that they (or any other imported fill <br />source material) be kept within about two points of their optimum Modified <br />Proctor moisture content to help avoid pumping under compaction or construction <br />ZL <br />I <br />� <br />� <br />I <br />1 <br />I <br />!� <br />I <br />1 <br />I <br />1 <br />� <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.