Laserfiche WebLink
Geotechnical Engineering Study Page 12 <br />00-2267 Three Story Addition - 500 Laurel Street, Everett <br />January 31, 2001 <br />traffic activity. it should also be clearly understood that a substantial portion of <br />the soils are considered to be "moisture sensitive" and subject to rapid <br />disturbance and deterioration e�•en under light pedestrian traffic when wet. <br />The site is, as mentioned earlier, underlain at relatively shallow depth by a firm and <br />ccmpetent native silty sand and sandy silt soil. FuRhermore, there is no shallew <br />groundwater level bE��eath the sita, and no visible evidence of any localized <br />erosional damage, shallow sloughin3 or deeper seated failure on the site slope or <br />in the immediately surrounding area. Based on our visual site evaluation, and as <br />supported by our geotechnical analyses, it is our professional opinion that the <br />sites' westem slope is stable under both static and dynamic conditions in its <br />existing condition and configuration. It is also our opinion that the site slope <br />should be expected to remain stable in its post construction configuration under <br />static and dynamic conditions fortha reasonable lif�etime oftt�e residence. <br />The distance bet�.�een the closest point of the existing residence to the crest of the <br />existing bluff slope, the bui(dings northwestern comer, is twenty-three (23) feet. If <br />the addition is built as currently intended the distance between the northwestem <br />corner of the addition and the crest of the slope will be twenty-two feet six inches <br />(22' - 6"). Bast� on the firm and competent soils fcund beneath the site it is oi:r <br />professional opinion that this distance is a sufficient setback to preserve the <br />integrity of the structure and avoid disturbing the slope. <br />These and other geotechnical aspects of the project are discussed in m�re detail <br />in the following sections of this report. <br />Site Prea�ration and General carthwork <br />General: Based on our understanding of the proposed site development, it is our <br />opinion that the proposed construction is geotechnically feasible provided tnat our <br />recommendations are carefully followed. It appears that there will be a need for <br />only a minor amount of excavation to create the space for the new addition. The <br />following paragraphs outline the eartnwork measures likely to be involved in site <br />development. <br />I DPmolition: The first step in construction of the proposed addi±�on will be to <br />demolish and �emove a substantial portion uf the low concrete retaining wall that <br />z3 <br />