My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
500 LAUREL DR 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
LAUREL DR
>
500
>
500 LAUREL DR 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2017 12:48:45 PM
Creation date
2/19/2017 1:37:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
LAUREL DR
Street Number
500
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
, <br />( <br />the Planning Direc[or to authorize the alteration of a slope or its buffer if ne <br />approves a geotechnical report, which demonstrates that: <br />1. the proposed development will not create a hazard to the subject properry, <br />surrounding properties or rights-of-way, erosion or sedimentation to off-site <br />propertiec or bodies of water; and <br />2. [he proposal addresses the existing geological constraints of the site, <br />including an assessment of soils and hydrology; and <br />3.. Uie proposed metl�od of construction will reduce erosion potential, landslide <br />and seismic hazard potential, and •,vill improve ar not adversely affect the <br />stabiliry of slopes; and <br />4. the proposal uses construction techniques which minimize disruption of <br />existing topography and natural vegetation; and <br />5. the proposal is consistent with the purposes and provisions of this <br />Ordinance; and <br />6. the proposal mitiga[es all impacts identified in the geotechnical reporr, and <br />7. all utilities and access roads or driveways to and within the site be located <br />so as to require the minimum amount of modification to slopes, vegetation or <br />geologically hazardous areas. <br />CONCLUSIONS: The following cor.:lusions are based upon tlte findings nf <br />the geotechnical report prepared by CGO. <br />1. The proposed development should nut adversely impact the slope if the <br />recommendations of the geotechnical report are follo�ved. The final design <br />plans sl�all be revie�ved by CEO to insure that the earthwork, foundation, <br />and drai��age have been properly implemented in the buildir.g plans. <br />2. An exploratory boring just iuside the footprint of the proposed addition <br />demnnstrates that the slope is composed of inedium den>e surficial and <br />shallow silry sand soii and hard, finer grained, silry soil a. greater depths. <br />There was no surface water visible. Groundwater seepage was encountered <br />at a depNi of approximately 16 feet. The seepage is c�nsidered the result of <br />in6ltration of precipitation into the ground upgrade from this site. The <br />well established groundwater level is proUably 120 feet below the existing <br />site. <br />� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.