Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> ' said affidavit , and are discussed beiow in detail . �ased on the__ <br /> � grounds, plaintiff prayed that a Writ ef Certiorari be issued by <br /> this Court directing the Soard of Adjustment of the City of Everett <br /> and its members, individually, to c�_rtify said Board of Adjustmer.=' s <br /> record in said l�roceedings to the Court so that the reasonableness <br /> � and lawfulness of its final approval of a variance to CLrIYTON FU',.�R <br /> � of 2902 Hewitt Avenue, Everett, Washington may be inquired into and <br /> � determined. <br /> ! <br /> ' On October lI, 1977, this ,Court entered an Order foz Issuance <br /> i <br /> i of �Writ of Certiorari, to the Board of Adjustment of the City of <br /> Everett, ar.3. to .its members. It further ordered that all proceed- <br /> � ings in this i,atter be stayed pending the disposition of the r.eview <br /> ; <br /> � by the Court. <br /> 11 Writ of Certiorari was issued from this Court on October 1?- . <br /> 1977. . . <br /> II. PROPRZETY' OF REVIEW • <br /> The EveretL Munici.p:.l Code, Section ).9•70. 08G , pzovides that <br /> • the decision of the Board of Adjustnent grantir,g a variance beco�s <br /> final upon the expiration of five (5) days from the date of its <br /> entry in the Board' s official records, and that the decision of the <br /> IIoard "shall be final, subject to review by the Superior Ce»*t• " <br /> Thus, plainti.ff has exhausted all his administrative remedies. <br /> It is well estahl.ished in �9ashington law that the Courts will <br /> review a decision by municipa.l zoning authorities where there is <br /> arbitrary and capricious conduct, ceiined as conduct • ithout <br /> -2- <br />