Laserfiche WebLink
� � <br />D�x <br />C M <br />>HN <br />N � �' <br />� �H <br />� H 7�C <br />ro�� <br />y N <br />�xp <br />HC <br />'�g <br />Q V (% <br />H <br />z� <br />� i-+ H <br />y N <br />C�y� � V� <br />HO� <br />car garage can be rebuilt on the same footprint and can be <br />certified as an existing non-conforming building. The new <br />garaqe will be constructed in the same location as the <br />existing gasage. <br />�iterion No. 2: That the variance will not be materially <br />detrimental to the property in the ar�a of the subject property <br />or to the city as a whole. <br />a. Findinas: No written adverse comments have been received <br />at this tir�e. The Applicant has stated that the variance <br />will not be detrimental because it will be a standard two <br />car qarage within all boundaries and will not restrict any <br />view nor be an eyesore. <br />b. Conclueions: The variance should not be materially <br />detrimental to the property in the area of the subject <br />proptrty or to the city as a whole. <br />Criterion No. 3: That the variance will only grant the subject <br />property the same general riqhts enjoyed by other property in the <br />same area and zone as the subject property. <br />a. F1D$3DQfl: The applicant has stated that the variance will <br />only grant him an opportunity to park his cars inside as <br />and to work on them indoors when the weather is adverse, <br />and that this is no more than what most other properties <br />have in the neighborhood. <br />b. Conclusions: The surroundinq properties are developed with <br />residential uses, the majority of which have qaraqes. Two <br />garaqes in the area are very larqe and exceed the code <br />allowance for accessory structures. The qrantinq of the <br />variance would permit tSie subject property the same riqhts <br />enjoyed by other properties in the area. <br />�iterion No. 4: That the variance is the minimum necessary to <br />allow the subject property the general right•s described in <br />Criterion 3. <br />a. ���H: See Criteria N3. <br />b. Conclusiona: See Criteria 13. <br />Criterion No. 5: The grantinq of the variance is not inconsistent <br />with the qoals and policies of the Everett General Plan. <br />a, g3�@: The Everett General Plan desiqnates this <br />property as Single Family Detached. The Applicant has <br />stated that the variance request is not inconsistent with <br />the Everett General Plan as he is only requestinq to <br />replace a one car garaqe with a two car qaraqe that is <br />consistent with the area. <br />