Laserfiche WebLink
Terhune Homes, Inc. JN 99028 <br />February 25, i999 Page 2 <br />The final logs represent our interpretations of the field logs. The stratification lines on the logs <br />represent the approximate boundaries between soil types at the exploration locations. The actual <br />transition between soil types may be gradual, and subsurface conditions can vary between <br />exploration locations. The logs provide specific subsurface information only at the locations tested. <br />The relative densities and moisture descriptions indicated on the test pit logs are interpretive <br />descriptions based on the conditions observed during excavation. <br />The compaction of backfill was not in the scope of our services. Loose soil will therefore be found <br />in the area of the test pits. If this presents a problem, the backfill will need to be removed and <br />replaced with structural fill during construction. <br />Groundwater <br />Groundwater seepage was observed in the two upslope test pits at depths of and 10 feet. The <br />test pits were Ic`t open for only a short time period. Therefore, the seepage levels on the logs <br />represent the location of transient water seepage and may not indicate the static, groundwater level. <br />It should be noted that groundwater levels vary seasonally with rainfall and other factors. The <br />absence of groundwater in our downslope explorations does not eliminate the possibility that <br />groundwater could be encountered in future excavations. <br />CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br />General <br />Based on the observations made during our site visit, it is our opinion that construction of the <br />proposed single-family residence is feasible from a geotechnical engineering standpoint. The <br />house may be supported on conventional foundations bearing directly on the native, medium -dense <br />to dense silty sand undcrlying the site. Some overexcavation will likely be required to expose <br />competent, native soils for the downslope footings. We recommend that footings on the downslope <br />perimeter and any deck footings be placed at least 5 feet below the existing c rounl surface. <br />Permanent fill slopes benched into the existing grade should be inclined no steeper than a 2.5:1 <br />(Horizontal: Vertical) inclination. Slopes over 4 feet hi in the crawl space should be covered with <br />a skim -coat of concrete or shotcrete to prevent sloughing. Even a 2.5:1 (H:V) slope is subject to <br />sloughing if the soil were to become dry. <br />The erosion control measures needed during the site development will depend heavily on the <br />weather conditions that are encountered. The existing slope consists of highly erodable, granular <br />soils. Site clearing will expose a large area; surface water must be directed away from the slope, <br />and bare areas should be covered with plastic and? revegetated as quickly as possible. We <br />anticipate that a sil' fence will be needed around the downslope side of any cleared areas. Rocked <br />construction access roads should be extended into the site to reduce the amount of mud carried off <br />the property by trucks and equipment. Following rough grading, it may be necessary to mulch or <br />hydroseed bare areas that will not be immediately covered with landscaping or an impervious <br />surface. <br />Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be allowed to review the final development plans to verify that the <br />recommendations presented in this report are adequately addressed in the design. Such a plan <br />GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. //6 <br />