Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> Ldrrq Hanaen <br /> Subdivielon Variance 28-90 <br /> Page —4— <br /> 16. �ere is a eignificant slope on the eastern portion of the property. <br /> The Applicant will be required to place the houae in a oanner ehat will <br /> be reaoved froa the property liaea. Thie Mill not impact thia property <br /> or other propertiee. <br /> 17• An ad�acent property osroer (Marufae) etated his concern about the <br /> location of the etructure on propoeed lot #2. He lodicated that �.he <br /> property ehould be set back froi the etreet in order to �aintain aisilar <br /> appearancee to the setbacka of other houeee in the ana. He aleo <br /> requested information with regazd to the eize of aetbacke for the <br /> proposed atructure. The City reapooded that the Applicant Would bc <br /> required to adhere to all aetback staodarde for R-2 zoned propertiee. <br /> 18. The Everett Planning Departuent reco�ended approval of the proposed <br /> variance eubJect to conditioos as set forth in the ataff report. <br /> CONCLUSIONS <br /> 1. 1he application ie for the approval of a variance from the lot width <br /> atnndarde for a propoeed tw—lot subdiviaion located at 2316 Eaet Grand <br /> Avenue, Everett, Wnshington. The apecific variance requeeted ia to <br /> allow lot /2 (the southern lot of the propoeed txo—lot aubdivYsion) to <br /> have a 38.5 foot �ride lot at the mid point rather th�n the required R-2 <br /> aoxd atandard of 50 feet. <br /> 2. 1Le Hearing Eza�iner of the City of Everett hae juriadictional authority <br /> to hold a hearing and to issue a deciaion baeed on the authority granted <br /> his in the ordinances of the City of Everett. <br /> 3. The City of Everett Subdivision Ordinancea eetablieh the procedure and <br /> criteria for variancee. Becauee the request of the Applicant <br /> conetitutea a variance of more than lOx, an adminiatrative hearing ia <br /> nquired. <br /> 4. Ttte criteria for revieM for variances have been revieved pureuant to ehe <br /> testimony a� evidence su6oitted at the public hearing. With <br /> condltionn� these criteria are eatisfied. <br /> 5. , IDcceptional circuoetancen and cooditione ezist for the grant of the <br /> variance. Hecauae of the location of the ezieting etructure on proposed <br /> lot #1� the configuration of propoeed lot t2 ie irregular. As the <br /> result of the irregulariiy. a variance from the lot s►idth etandarda !a <br /> neceeeary in order for the lot to be developed. <br /> 6. The variance xill not be detrimmtal to the public welfare nor will it <br /> be in�urioue to the property in the vicinity or zone in which the <br /> prnperty is located. <br />