Laserfiche WebLink
r -� <br /> � <br /> , <br /> � <br /> i <br /> � <br /> . � <br /> i <br /> ' � <br /> � - z - ! '7 <br /> i <br /> I <br /> PUBLIC WELFARE: � <br /> ' i <br /> Finding: The deck is built and doee block the view of the adjacent � <br /> property, I <br /> I <br /> Concluaion: The addition of the three additional feet blocke the view <br /> from the adjacent property, and ia detrimental and injurioue [o the <br /> adjacent pruperty to ehe aouth. � <br /> i <br /> COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: i <br /> Finding: 1968 Plan ahove thia area as Single Family Reaidential. The i <br /> 1972 Update ehowe thie area ae Medium Denaity Reeidential. I <br /> Conclusion: Thie area ie residential and [hie type of reeidential <br /> ahould be alloved to take advantage af the natural beauty of the City. <br /> �View of Port Gardner Bay.) <br /> SCISION: DENY <br /> Deny a Variance in the B-2 zone which vould allov the conetzuction of . <br /> eundeck on the exiating garage for the following reaeone: <br /> 1. There are no exceptional or eatraordinary circamstancea thst <br /> epply to thie property. <br /> 2. The applicant caused his own hardahip. <br /> 3. The Variance would block t6e view of [he adjacent property to the <br /> South and be detrimental to [hoae property values. <br /> 4. The Vaziance vill effect the Compreheneive Plan. <br /> OTE: FOH AGAINST ABSENT AHSTAIN <br /> r. Roagland R <br /> � . {�1100R .e <br /> . Zook % <br /> . Barne[t B <br /> . Miller R <br /> �Q � id�o---r�-�.� J <br /> L Chaizman, Board of djui�et�ent <br /> � <br /> t.. � <br />