Laserfiche WebLink
2. That such varianoe is neoessary for the preservation and enjoyment of <br />a substantial property right of the appellant possessed by the ownare <br />of other properties in the same vieinity or zone. <br />Finding: The Board of Adjustment ha� granted other requeeta for <br />varianoe from gross floor area ratio and the City Will aontinue to <br />reaommend doing so until the zoning code is chanped. <br />There are other propertias in the same vicinity that appear to e�coeed <br />gross floor area ratio. <br />Conolusion: The variance would aliow a property right possessed by <br />other oKners. <br />3• That the authorization of sueh variance xill not be matarially <br />detrimental to the public xelfare or injurious to property in the <br />vioinity or zone in which the property is located. <br />FSndings The actual lot coverage is .2� and the zoning code limita <br />the height of the strueture to 35 feet, so it does not appear that <br />there xould be any adverse affect on other property. <br />Conolusion: This variance aould not be in,jurious to other property <br />in the viainity and zone. <br />4. That the granting of such varianee rrill not adversely affeat the <br />Comprehensive General Plan. <br />Finding: The Comprehensive Plan designated is single family <br />reaidantial. <br />Conolusions The requested variance does not conPlict with the <br />poliaiee of the Comprehensive Plan. <br />APPAOY6 the varianoe as requested by applicant with the folloxing oondition. <br />1. The applioant obtain all neaessary Building and Public Morka <br />permite. <br />Prepared by <br />Reoeived by <br />2053� <br />-Z- <br />