My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4626 HARBOR LN 2018-01-02 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
HARBOR LN
>
4626
>
4626 HARBOR LN 2018-01-02 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2022 2:43:18 PM
Creation date
2/20/2017 10:17:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
HARBOR LN
Street Number
4626
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation <br />Fox Residence Underpinning and Retaining Wall Design <br />Everett, Washington <br />NGA File No.853512 <br />August 3, 2012 <br />Page 5 <br />or better native soils expected to be encountered in the wall subgrades after fill removal should provide <br />suitable support for the wall fills and new backlill. We recommend that the wall and retained fill <br />footprint be over -excavated down to the underlying medium dense or better native soil and the wall be <br />supported on this rn.tcriel. The total height of the wall will vary, but should be limited to 8.0 feet in total <br />height, including a 1.5-foot base embedment into the native material. The wall recommendations are <br />discussed further in the Wall Design and Construction Recommendations subsection of this report. <br />We recommend that the pin piles for the garage foundation support be installed before the undocumented <br />fill is removed and new retaining wall constructed. <br />The soils encountered on this site are considered moisture -sensitive, and can disturb when wet. We <br />recommend that construction take place during the drier summer months, if possible. If construction is to <br />take place during wet weather, the soils may disturb and additional expenses and delays may be expected <br />due to the wet conditions. Additional expenses could include the need for placing a blanket of rock spalls <br />to protect exposed subgradcs and construction traffic areas. The non -organic on -site soils could be used <br />as structural fill provided they could be compacted to specifications. This will depend on the moisture <br />content of the soils at the time of construction. NGA should be retained to determine if the on -site soils <br />can be used as structural till material during construction. <br />Under no circumstances, should water be allowed to flow on the sloping ground surface both during <br />construction and after construction have been completed. We recommend that all of the footing and roof <br />drains be investigated to ensure that all of drains are functioning property. All drains including existing <br />roof, footing, yard drains, and any new drains associated with the new wall be directed to a new main <br />catch basin to be located downhill of the residence and directed to a level area and outletted with in a <br />level spreader. This is discussed further in the site Drainage subsection of this report. <br />The sloping ground below the wall area should be protected from erosion. We recommend that all <br />disturbed areas be replanted with vegetation to re-establish vegetation cover as soon as possible. Specific <br />recommendations for erosion control are presented in the Erosion Control and Slope Protection <br />Measures subsection of this report. <br />Erosion Control and Slope Protection <br />The erosion hazard for the on -site soils is listed as moderate to high, but the actual hazard will be <br />dependent on how the site is graded and how water is allowed to concentrate. Best Management Practices <br />NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, 'NC. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.